Jesse Schell

1.4k citations
10 papers · 845 · 1 hit paper · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Jesse Schell

9 papers receiving 734 citations

Jesse Schell's Hit Papers

The Art of Game Design 2008 · 729 citations
7290+6+12Years since publication200400600

Peers

Jesse Schell
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Human-Computer Interaction 211
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 475
  • Computer Science Applications 106
  • Sociology and Political Science 353
  • Applied Psychology 33
Replace José P. Zagal with:
José P. Zagal United States
Cláudia Ribeiro Portugal
Rina R. Wehbe Canada
Lynne Hall United Kingdom
Tracy Fullerton United States
Tarja Susi Sweden
Christof van Nimwegen Netherlands
Markus Montola Finland
Jan David Smeddinck Germany
Hakan Tüzün Türkiye
Jesse Schell relative to José P. Zagal United States José P. Zagal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
José P. Zagal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jesse Schell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jesse Schell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jesse Schell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jesse Schell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jesse Schell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jesse Schell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jesse Schell. The network helps show where Jesse Schell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Jesse Schell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jesse Schell Line = papers co-authored together Jesse Schell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1
The Art of Game Design
Hit paper breakdown →
2008729
2 200532
3
The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition
201418
4 201917
5 201316
6 201613
7 20149
8
Understanding entertainment: story and gameplay are one
20027
9 20124
10
Die Kunst des Game Designs
20200

About Jesse Schell

Jesse Schell is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 10 papers that have together received 845 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (4 papers), Media Influence and Health (2 papers), Psychological Treatments and Assessments (1 paper), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (1 paper), Artificial Intelligence in Games (1 paper), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (1 paper), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (1 paper) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (211 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (475 citations), Computer Science Applications (106 citations), Sociology and Political Science (353 citations) and Applied Psychology (33 citations). Jesse Schell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Derek C. Angus, Deepika Mohan, Amy Shirong Lu, Richard Buday, Tom Baranowski, Elizabeth Lyons, Carmen Russoniello, H. Chad Lane, Michael A. Evans and Peter M. Bingham. Their work appears in journals such as Games for Health Journal, JAMA and Computers in entertainment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact