Jennifer E. Dysart

1.5k total citations
24 papers, 827 citations indexed

About

Jennifer E. Dysart is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Jennifer E. Dysart has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 827 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 16 papers in Social Psychology and 8 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Jennifer E. Dysart's work include Memory Processes and Influences (16 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (16 papers) and Radiology practices and education (8 papers). Jennifer E. Dysart is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (16 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (16 papers) and Radiology practices and education (8 papers). Jennifer E. Dysart collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Russia. Jennifer E. Dysart's co-authors include Nancy K. Steblay, R. C. L. Lindsay, Gary L. Wells, Solomon M. Fulero, Deryn Strange, Tara K. MacDonald, Paul Dupuis, Steven M. Smith, Steven Penrod and Margaret Bull Kovera and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Perspectives on Psychological Science and Applied Cognitive Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Jennifer E. Dysart

23 papers receiving 751 citations

Peers

Jennifer E. Dysart

CN

SP

RNMI

SPS

LAW

Nancy K. Steblay United States

C. A. Elizabeth Brimacombe Canada

Amy Bradfield Douglass United States

Robert K. Bothwell United States

Curt A. Carlson United States

Amy L. Bradfield United States

Steve D. Charman United States

Melanie Sauerland Netherlands

Rachel Wilcock United Kingdom

Heather L. Price Canada

Nancy K. Steblay United States

Jennifer E. Dysart

667 ×1.0

CN

587 ×1.0

SP

199 ×1.2

RNMI

125 ×1.3

SPS

145 ×1.6

LAW

Citations per year, relative to Jennifer E. Dysart Jennifer E. Dysart (= 1×) peers Nancy K. Steblay

Countries citing papers authored by Jennifer E. Dysart

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jennifer E. Dysart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jennifer E. Dysart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jennifer E. Dysart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jennifer E. Dysart

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jennifer E. Dysart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jennifer E. Dysart. The network helps show where Jennifer E. Dysart may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jennifer E. Dysart

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jennifer E. Dysart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jennifer E. Dysart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jennifer E. Dysart. Jennifer E. Dysart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Steblay, Nancy K., Jennifer E. Dysart, & Gary L. Wells. (2015). An unrepresentative sample is unrepresentative regardless of the reason: a rejoinder to Amendola and Wixted. Journal of Experimental Criminology. 11(2). 295–298. 2 indexed citations

2.

Wells, Gary L., Nancy K. Steblay, & Jennifer E. Dysart. (2014). Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: An experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure.. Law and Human Behavior. 39(1). 1–14. 58 indexed citations

3.

Strange, Deryn, Jennifer E. Dysart, & Elizabeth F. Loftus. (2014). Why Errors in Alibis Are Not Necessarily Evidence of Guilt. Zeitschrift für Psychologie. 222(2). 82–89.

4.

Wells, Gary L., Nancy K. Steblay, & Jennifer E. Dysart. (2012). Eyewitness Identification Reforms. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 7(3). 264–271. 35 indexed citations

5.

Dysart, Jennifer E., et al.. (2012). The showup identification procedure: An exploration of systematic biases. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 19(1). 54–68. 8 indexed citations

6.

Dysart, Jennifer E. & Deryn Strange. (2012). Beliefs about alibis and alibi investigations: a survey of law enforcement. Psychology Crime and Law. 18(1). 11–25. 36 indexed citations

7.

Dysart, Jennifer E., et al.. (2011). Blind lineup administration as a prophylactic against the postidentification feedback effect.. Law and Human Behavior. 36(4). 312–319. 20 indexed citations

8.

Steblay, Nancy K., Jennifer E. Dysart, & Gary L. Wells. (2011). Seventy-two tests of the sequential lineup superiority effect: A meta-analysis and policy discussion.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 17(1). 99–139. 140 indexed citations

9.

Dysart, Jennifer E. & R. C. L. Lindsay. (2007). The Effects of Delay on Eyewitness Identification Accuracy: Should We Be Concerned?. 375–390. 10 indexed citations

10.

Penrod, Steven, et al.. (2006). The Street, the Lab, the Courtroom, the Meeting Room. 11(2). 13. 3 indexed citations

11.

Dysart, Jennifer E., et al.. (2006). Show-ups: the critical issue of clothing bias. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 20(8). 1009–1023. 20 indexed citations

12.

Lindsay, R. C. L., et al.. (2004). Multiple Independent Identification Decisions: A Method of Calibrating Eyewitness Identifications.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 89(1). 73–84. 34 indexed citations

13.

Steblay, Nancy K., Jennifer E. Dysart, Solomon M. Fulero, & R. C. L. Lindsay. (2003). Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison.. Law and Human Behavior. 27(5). 523–540. 97 indexed citations

14.

Dysart, Jennifer E., et al.. (2002). The intoxicated witness: Effects of alcohol on identification accuracy from showups.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 87(1). 170–175. 46 indexed citations

15.

Dysart, Jennifer E. & R. C. L. Lindsay. (2001). A preidentification questioning effect: Serendipitously increasing correct rejections.. Law and Human Behavior. 25(2). 155–165. 12 indexed citations

16.

Dysart, Jennifer E., et al.. (2001). Mug shot exposure prior to lineup identification: Interference, transference, and commitment effects.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 86(6). 1280–1284. 42 indexed citations

17.

Steblay, Nancy K., Jennifer E. Dysart, Solomon M. Fulero, & R. C. L. Lindsay. (2001). Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison.. Law and Human Behavior. 25(5). 459–473. 178 indexed citations

18.

Smith, Steven M., et al.. (2001). Postdictors of eyewitness errors: Can false identifications be diagnosed in the cross-race situation?. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 7(1). 153–169. 36 indexed citations

19.

Smith, S. M., et al.. (2001). Postdictors of eyewitness errors: Can false identifications be diagnosed in the cross-race situation?. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 7(1). 153–169. 1 indexed citations

20.

Dysart, Jennifer E., et al.. (2001). Mug shot exposure prior to lineup identification: Interference, transference, and commitment effects.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 86(6). 1280–1284. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact