Steven Penrod

10.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
137 papers, 6.8k citations indexed

About

Steven Penrod is a scholar working on Law, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Steven Penrod has authored 137 papers receiving a total of 6.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 61 papers in Law, 49 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 41 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Steven Penrod's work include Jury Decision Making Processes (56 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (45 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (35 papers). Steven Penrod is often cited by papers focused on Jury Decision Making Processes (56 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (45 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (35 papers). Steven Penrod collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Steven Penrod's co-authors include Brian L. Cutler, Reid Hastie, Nancy Pennington, Daniel Linz, Peter N. Shapiro, Edward Donnerstein, Gary L. Wells, Sarah Tanford, Brian H. Bornstein and Hedy R. Dexter and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychological Bulletin and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Steven Penrod

131 papers receiving 6.1k citations

Hit Papers

Inside the Jury 1983 2026 1997 2011 1983 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Steven Penrod United States 43 3.3k 3.0k 1.7k 1.6k 832 137 6.8k
Saul M. Kassin United States 47 3.1k 0.9× 5.6k 1.9× 1.3k 0.7× 2.2k 1.4× 404 0.5× 162 7.8k
Amina Memon United Kingdom 42 4.2k 1.3× 3.3k 1.1× 343 0.2× 873 0.6× 170 0.2× 140 5.6k
Roy S. Malpass United States 28 2.8k 0.9× 2.2k 0.7× 263 0.2× 1.1k 0.7× 122 0.1× 64 4.5k
Ray Bull United Kingdom 43 2.5k 0.7× 4.0k 1.3× 276 0.2× 1.9k 1.2× 701 0.8× 177 6.0k
Michael R. Leippe United States 27 1.0k 0.3× 1.2k 0.4× 275 0.2× 941 0.6× 165 0.2× 49 2.7k
Jennifer L. Eberhardt United States 25 1.6k 0.5× 1.5k 0.5× 152 0.1× 3.2k 2.1× 620 0.7× 53 5.7k
Pär Anders Granhag Sweden 43 3.0k 0.9× 5.6k 1.9× 260 0.1× 2.4k 1.5× 224 0.3× 207 6.5k
Shane Connelly United States 39 1.7k 0.5× 1.2k 0.4× 169 0.1× 953 0.6× 251 0.3× 122 5.7k
Anne Maass Italy 46 1.1k 0.3× 2.6k 0.9× 96 0.1× 3.6k 2.3× 1.5k 1.7× 135 6.4k
Colin Tredoux South Africa 31 990 0.3× 1.3k 0.4× 61 0.0× 1.9k 1.2× 414 0.5× 120 3.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Steven Penrod

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven Penrod's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven Penrod with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven Penrod more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven Penrod

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven Penrod. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven Penrod. The network helps show where Steven Penrod may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven Penrod

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven Penrod. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven Penrod based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven Penrod. Steven Penrod is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Penrod, Steven, et al.. (2019). New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups.. Law and Human Behavior. 43(5). 436–454. 12 indexed citations
2.
Smith, Andrew M., Gary L. Wells, R. C. L. Lindsay, & Steven Penrod. (2016). Fair lineups are better than biased lineups and showups, but not because they increase underlying discriminability.. Law and Human Behavior. 41(2). 127–145. 40 indexed citations
3.
Deffenbacher, Kenneth A., Brian H. Bornstein, E. Kiernan McGorty, & Steven Penrod. (2008). Forgetting the once-seen face: Estimating the strength of an eyewitness's memory representation.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 14(2). 139–150. 69 indexed citations
4.
Heuer, Larry, et al.. (2007). The role of societal benefits and fairness concerns among decision makers and decision recipients.. Law and Human Behavior. 31(6). 573–610. 30 indexed citations
5.
Penrod, Steven, et al.. (2006). The Street, the Lab, the Courtroom, the Meeting Room. 11(2). 13. 3 indexed citations
6.
Deffenbacher, Kenneth A., Brian H. Bornstein, & Steven Penrod. (2006). Mugshot Exposure Effects: Retroactive Interference, Mugshot Commitment, Source Confusion, and Unconscious Transference.. Law and Human Behavior. 30(3). 287–307. 78 indexed citations
7.
Deffenbacher, Kenneth A., Brian H. Bornstein, Steven Penrod, & E. Kiernan McGorty. (2004). A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effects of High Stress on Eyewitness Memory.. Law and Human Behavior. 28(6). 687–706. 305 indexed citations
8.
Studebaker, Christina A., et al.. (2002). Studying pretrial publicity effects: New methods for improving ecological validity and testing external validity.. Law and Human Behavior. 26(1). 19–41. 3 indexed citations
9.
Robbennolt, Jennifer K., et al.. (2002). Fractional factorial designs for legal psychology. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 20(1-2). 5–17. 15 indexed citations
10.
O’Neil, Kevin & Steven Penrod. (2001). Methodological variables in Web-based research that may affect results: Sample type, monetary incentives, and personal information. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 33(2). 226–233. 84 indexed citations
11.
Studebaker, Christina A., et al.. (2000). Assessing pretrial publicity effects: Integrating content analytic results.. Law and Human Behavior. 24(3). 317–336. 3 indexed citations
12.
Kovera, Margaret Bull, et al.. (1997). Identification of computer-generated facial composites.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 82(2). 235–246. 35 indexed citations
13.
Smith, Brian C., et al.. (1996). Jurors' use of probabilistic evidence.. Law and Human Behavior. 20(1). 49–82. 53 indexed citations
14.
Penrod, Steven, Solomon M. Fulero, & Brian L. Cutler. (1995). Expert psychological testimony on eyewitness reliability before and afterDaubert: The state of the law and the science. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 13(2). 229–259. 30 indexed citations
15.
Kovera, Margaret Bull, et al.. (1992). Jurors' Perceptions of Eyewitness and Hearsay Evidence. Minnesota law review. 76. 703. 17 indexed citations
16.
Olczak, Paul V., Martin F. Kaplan, & Steven Penrod. (1991). Attorneys' lay psychology and its effectiveness in selecting jurors: Three empirical studies.. Journal of social behavior and personality. 19 indexed citations
17.
Tanford, Sarah & Steven Penrod. (1990). Las deliberaciones del jurado: Contenido de la discusión y procesos de influencia en la toma de decisiones de un jurado. Studies in Psychology Estudios de Psicología. 11(42). 75–98. 2 indexed citations
18.
Heuer, Larry & Steven Penrod. (1989). Instructing jurors: A field experiment with written and preliminary instructions.. Law and Human Behavior. 13(4). 409–430. 69 indexed citations
19.
Linz, Daniel, Edward Donnerstein, & Steven Penrod. (1988). Effects of long-term exposure to violent and sexually degrading depictions of women.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 55(5). 758–768. 49 indexed citations
20.
Hastie, Reid, Steven Penrod, & Nancy Pennington. (1983). Inside the Jury. Harvard University Press eBooks. 262 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026