Nancy K. Steblay

1.6k total citations
24 papers, 867 citations indexed

About

Nancy K. Steblay is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Nancy K. Steblay has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 867 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 15 papers in Social Psychology and 8 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Nancy K. Steblay's work include Memory Processes and Influences (16 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (15 papers) and Radiology practices and education (8 papers). Nancy K. Steblay is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (16 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (15 papers) and Radiology practices and education (8 papers). Nancy K. Steblay collaborates with scholars based in United States, Russia and Canada. Nancy K. Steblay's co-authors include Jennifer E. Dysart, Gary L. Wells, Solomon M. Fulero, R. C. L. Lindsay, Amy Bradfield Douglass, Scott E. Culhane, Harmon M. Hosch, Jonathan D. Phillips, Michael E. Lamb and Tess M. S. Neal and has published in prestigious journals such as Perspectives on Psychological Science, Applied Cognitive Psychology and Law and Human Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Nancy K. Steblay

24 papers receiving 793 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nancy K. Steblay United States 12 667 587 199 145 125 24 867
Jennifer E. Dysart United States 14 700 1.0× 587 1.0× 173 0.9× 93 0.6× 99 0.8× 24 827
C. A. Elizabeth Brimacombe Canada 11 556 0.8× 515 0.9× 143 0.7× 139 1.0× 121 1.0× 14 764
Amy L. Bradfield United States 9 556 0.8× 494 0.8× 177 0.9× 134 0.9× 133 1.1× 11 696
Robert K. Bothwell United States 13 627 0.9× 379 0.6× 133 0.7× 97 0.7× 152 1.2× 18 852
C. A. Elizabeth Lüüs United States 8 347 0.5× 310 0.5× 109 0.5× 51 0.4× 103 0.8× 9 567
Laura Smalarz United States 13 255 0.4× 295 0.5× 70 0.4× 44 0.3× 205 1.6× 33 538
Nadja Schreiber Compo United States 16 543 0.8× 617 1.1× 57 0.3× 31 0.2× 210 1.7× 43 857
Robert Buckhout United States 12 319 0.5× 274 0.5× 59 0.3× 83 0.6× 96 0.8× 33 600
Miko M. Wilford United States 12 210 0.3× 205 0.3× 20 0.1× 38 0.3× 127 1.0× 29 419
Peter N. Shapiro United States 7 405 0.6× 300 0.5× 50 0.3× 30 0.2× 215 1.7× 8 620

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy K. Steblay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy K. Steblay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy K. Steblay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy K. Steblay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy K. Steblay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy K. Steblay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy K. Steblay. The network helps show where Nancy K. Steblay may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nancy K. Steblay

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nancy K. Steblay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nancy K. Steblay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nancy K. Steblay. Nancy K. Steblay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Steblay, Nancy K. & Gary L. Wells. (2023). In their own words: Verbalizations of real eyewitnesses during identification lineups.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 29(3). 272–287. 3 indexed citations
2.
Lamb, Michael E., Nancy K. Steblay, & Tess M. S. Neal. (2021). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law adopts further open science practices and refreshes its commitment to generalizable empirical research.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 27(3). 293–294. 2 indexed citations
3.
Steblay, Nancy K. & Gary L. Wells. (2020). Assessment of bias in police lineups.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 26(4). 393–412. 9 indexed citations
4.
Steblay, Nancy K.. (2018). All is not as it seems: Avoidable pitfalls in the interpretation of lineup field data.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 24(3). 292–306. 4 indexed citations
5.
Steblay, Nancy K. & Jennifer E. Dysart. (2016). Repeated eyewitness identification procedures with the same suspect.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 5(3). 284–289. 19 indexed citations
6.
Steblay, Nancy K.. (2015). Scientific Advances in Eyewitness Identification Evidence. William Mitchell law review. 41(3). 11. 2 indexed citations
7.
Steblay, Nancy K., Jennifer E. Dysart, & Gary L. Wells. (2015). An unrepresentative sample is unrepresentative regardless of the reason: a rejoinder to Amendola and Wixted. Journal of Experimental Criminology. 11(2). 295–298. 2 indexed citations
8.
Wells, Gary L., Nancy K. Steblay, & Jennifer E. Dysart. (2014). Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: An experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure.. Law and Human Behavior. 39(1). 1–14. 58 indexed citations
9.
Steblay, Nancy K., et al.. (2013). Double Exposure: The Effects of Repeated Identification Lineups on Eyewitness Accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 27(5). 644–654. 16 indexed citations
10.
Wells, Gary L., Nancy K. Steblay, & Jennifer E. Dysart. (2012). Eyewitness Identification Reforms. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 7(3). 264–271. 35 indexed citations
11.
Steblay, Nancy K.. (2011). How I Got Started: Field Experiments, Meta‐analysis, and Eyewitness Memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 26(5). 823–824. 1 indexed citations
12.
Steblay, Nancy K., Jennifer E. Dysart, & Gary L. Wells. (2011). Seventy-two tests of the sequential lineup superiority effect: A meta-analysis and policy discussion.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 17(1). 99–139. 140 indexed citations
13.
Steblay, Nancy K.. (2010). What we know now: The Evanston Illinois field lineups.. Law and Human Behavior. 35(1). 1–12. 19 indexed citations
14.
Steblay, Nancy K., et al.. (2010). Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy.. Law and Human Behavior. 35(4). 262–274. 21 indexed citations
15.
Steblay, Nancy K.. (2009). Maintaining the Reliability of Eyewitness Evidence: After the Lineup. 2 indexed citations
16.
Steblay, Nancy K., et al.. (2009). Multiple Identification Attempts with Simultaneous and Sequential Lineups. 1 indexed citations
17.
Steblay, Nancy K., et al.. (2006). The Impact on Juror Verdicts of Judicial Instruction to Disregard Inadmissible Evidence: A Meta-Analysis.. Law and Human Behavior. 30(4). 469–492. 91 indexed citations
18.
Douglass, Amy Bradfield & Nancy K. Steblay. (2006). Memory distortion in eyewitnesses: a meta-analysis of the post-identification feedback effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 20(7). 859–869. 86 indexed citations
19.
Steblay, Nancy K., Jennifer E. Dysart, Solomon M. Fulero, & R. C. L. Lindsay. (2003). Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison.. Law and Human Behavior. 27(5). 523–540. 97 indexed citations
20.
Steblay, Nancy K., Jennifer E. Dysart, Solomon M. Fulero, & R. C. L. Lindsay. (2001). Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison.. Law and Human Behavior. 25(5). 459–473. 178 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennifer E. Dysart Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C. A. Elizabeth Brimacombe Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Amy L. Bradfield Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert K. Bothwell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C. A. Elizabeth Lüüs Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Laura Smalarz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nadja Schreiber Compo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert Buckhout Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Miko M. Wilford Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Peter N. Shapiro
Rankless by CCL
2026