Amy L. Bradfield

1.1k total citations
11 papers, 696 citations indexed

About

Amy L. Bradfield is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Amy L. Bradfield has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 696 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Social Psychology and 5 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Amy L. Bradfield's work include Memory Processes and Influences (7 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (5 papers) and Radiology practices and education (5 papers). Amy L. Bradfield is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (7 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (5 papers) and Radiology practices and education (5 papers). Amy L. Bradfield collaborates with scholars based in United States. Amy L. Bradfield's co-authors include Gary L. Wells, Elizabeth A. Olson and Michael A. Sargent and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Psychological Science and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

In The Last Decade

Amy L. Bradfield

11 papers receiving 647 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amy L. Bradfield United States	9	556	494	177	134	133	11	696
C. A. Elizabeth Brimacombe Canada	11	556 1.0×	515 1.0×	143 0.8×	139 1.0×	121 0.9×	14	764
Nancy K. Steblay United States	12	667 1.2×	587 1.2×	199 1.1×	145 1.1×	125 0.9×	24	867
Jennifer E. Dysart United States	14	700 1.3×	587 1.2×	173 1.0×	93 0.7×	99 0.7×	24	827
C. A. Elizabeth Lüüs United States	8	347 0.6×	310 0.6×	109 0.6×	51 0.4×	103 0.8×	9	567
Amy Bradfield Douglass United States	12	419 0.8×	397 0.8×	114 0.6×	93 0.7×	78 0.6×	24	567
Robert Buckhout United States	12	319 0.6×	274 0.6×	59 0.3×	83 0.6×	96 0.7×	33	600
Rod C. L. Lindsay Canada	10	301 0.5×	257 0.5×	75 0.4×	33 0.2×	43 0.3×	19	406
Steve D. Charman United States	13	357 0.6×	301 0.6×	58 0.3×	66 0.5×	59 0.4×	29	449
Hedy R. Dexter United States	7	272 0.5×	269 0.5×	78 0.4×	303 2.3×	106 0.8×	8	545
Kerri L. Pickel United States	11	269 0.5×	233 0.5×	22 0.1×	74 0.6×	114 0.9×	26	418

Countries citing papers authored by Amy L. Bradfield

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy L. Bradfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy L. Bradfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy L. Bradfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy L. Bradfield

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy L. Bradfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy L. Bradfield. The network helps show where Amy L. Bradfield may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy L. Bradfield

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy L. Bradfield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy L. Bradfield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy L. Bradfield. Amy L. Bradfield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Bradfield, Amy L. & Gary L. Wells. (2005). Not the same old hindsight bias: Outcome information distorts a broad range of retrospective judgments. Memory & Cognition. 33(1). 120–130. 33 indexed citations

2.

Bradfield, Amy L., et al.. (2004). When Does Evidence of Eyewitness Confidence Inflation Affect Judgments in a Criminal Trial?. Law and Human Behavior. 28(4). 369–387. 22 indexed citations

3.

Sargent, Michael A. & Amy L. Bradfield. (2004). Race and Information Processing in Criminal Trials: Does the Defendant’s Race Affect How the Facts Are Evaluated?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 30(8). 995–1008. 57 indexed citations

4.

Bradfield, Amy L., Gary L. Wells, & Elizabeth A. Olson. (2002). The damaging effect of confirming feedback on the relation between eyewitness certainty and identification accuracy.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 87(1). 112–120. 108 indexed citations

5.

Bradfield, Amy L., Gary L. Wells, & Elizabeth A. Olson. (2002). The damaging effect of confirming feedback on the relation between eyewitness certainty and identification accuracy.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 87(1). 112–120. 8 indexed citations

6.

Bradfield, Amy L. & Gary L. Wells. (2000). The perceived validity of eyewitness identification testimony: A test of the five Biggers criteria.. Law and Human Behavior. 24(5). 581–594. 74 indexed citations

7.

Wells, Gary L. & Amy L. Bradfield. (1999). Measuring the goodness of lineups: parameter estimation, question effects, and limits to the mock witness paradigm. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 13(S1). S27–S39. 22 indexed citations

8.

Wells, Gary L. & Amy L. Bradfield. (1999). Measuring the goodness of lineups: parameter estimation, question effects, and limits to the mock witness paradigm. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 13(S1). S27–S39. 2 indexed citations

9.

Wells, Gary L. & Amy L. Bradfield. (1999). Distortions in Eyewitnesses' Recollections: Can the Postidentification-Feedback Effect Be Moderated?. Psychological Science. 10(2). 138–144. 98 indexed citations

10.

Wells, Gary L. & Amy L. Bradfield. (1998). "Good, you identified the suspect": Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 83(3). 360–376. 12 indexed citations

11.

Wells, Gary L. & Amy L. Bradfield. (1998). "Good, you identified the suspect": Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 83(3). 360–376. 260 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact