Amy Bradfield Douglass

1.0k total citations
24 papers, 567 citations indexed

About

Amy Bradfield Douglass is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Amy Bradfield Douglass has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 567 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Social Psychology, 16 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 10 papers in Law. Recurrent topics in Amy Bradfield Douglass's work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (16 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (15 papers) and Jury Decision Making Processes (10 papers). Amy Bradfield Douglass is often cited by papers focused on Deception detection and forensic psychology (16 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (15 papers) and Jury Decision Making Processes (10 papers). Amy Bradfield Douglass collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Amy Bradfield Douglass's co-authors include Nancy K. Steblay, Neil Brewer, Gary L. Wells, Margaret Bull Kovera, John T. Wixted, Christian A. Meissner, Samuel R. Sommers, R. A. Bornstein, Jeffrey S. Neuschatz and Dawn McQuiston‐Surrett and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Applied Cognitive Psychology and Law and Human Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Amy Bradfield Douglass

21 papers receiving 536 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amy Bradfield Douglass United States 12 419 397 114 93 78 24 567
C. A. Elizabeth Brimacombe Canada 11 556 1.3× 515 1.3× 143 1.3× 139 1.5× 121 1.6× 14 764
Jennifer E. Dysart United States 14 700 1.7× 587 1.5× 173 1.5× 93 1.0× 99 1.3× 24 827
Steve D. Charman United States 13 357 0.9× 301 0.8× 58 0.5× 66 0.7× 59 0.8× 29 449
Amy L. Bradfield United States 9 556 1.3× 494 1.2× 177 1.6× 134 1.4× 133 1.7× 11 696
Ryan J. Fitzgerald Canada 10 276 0.7× 197 0.5× 47 0.4× 27 0.3× 21 0.3× 35 342
Melanie Sauerland Netherlands 16 610 1.5× 449 1.1× 70 0.6× 17 0.2× 83 1.1× 87 741
Guenter Koehnken United Kingdom 8 335 0.8× 306 0.8× 34 0.3× 19 0.2× 51 0.7× 14 451
Robert Buckhout United States 12 319 0.8× 274 0.7× 59 0.5× 83 0.9× 96 1.2× 33 600
Jonathan P. Vallano United States 9 193 0.5× 313 0.8× 22 0.2× 42 0.5× 121 1.6× 20 407
C. A. Elizabeth Lüüs United States 8 347 0.8× 310 0.8× 109 1.0× 51 0.5× 103 1.3× 9 567

Countries citing papers authored by Amy Bradfield Douglass

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Bradfield Douglass's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Bradfield Douglass with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Bradfield Douglass more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Bradfield Douglass

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Bradfield Douglass. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Bradfield Douglass. The network helps show where Amy Bradfield Douglass may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy Bradfield Douglass

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy Bradfield Douglass. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy Bradfield Douglass based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy Bradfield Douglass. Amy Bradfield Douglass is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Douglass, Amy Bradfield, et al.. (2023). Racial bias in jury selection hurts mock jurors, not just defendants: Testing one potential intervention.. Law and Human Behavior. 47(1). 153–168.
2.
Douglass, Amy Bradfield. (2021). Bending toward justice in eyewitness identification research.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 10(3). 346–350. 1 indexed citations
3.
Bornstein, Brian H., et al.. (2020). Informants v. Innocents: Informant Testimony and its Contribution to Wrongful Convictions. 48(2). 149–188. 2 indexed citations
4.
Douglass, Amy Bradfield, et al.. (2020). Cowitness identification speed affects choices from target-absent photospreads.. Law and Human Behavior. 44(6). 474–484. 4 indexed citations
5.
Wells, Gary L., Margaret Bull Kovera, Amy Bradfield Douglass, et al.. (2020). Policy and procedure recommendations for the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence.. Law and Human Behavior. 44(1). 3–36. 136 indexed citations
6.
Neuschatz, Jeffrey S., et al.. (2020). The truth about snitches: an archival analysis of informant testimony. Psychiatry Psychology and Law. 28(4). 508–530. 4 indexed citations
7.
Brewer, Neil & Amy Bradfield Douglass. (2019). Psychological science and the law. 53 indexed citations
8.
Charman, Steve D., et al.. (2019). Cognitive bias in legal decision making.. 9 indexed citations
9.
Douglass, Amy Bradfield, et al.. (2013). The dynamic interaction between eyewitnesses and interviewers: The impact of differences in perspective on memory reports and interviewer behavior.. Law and Human Behavior. 37(4). 290–301. 3 indexed citations
10.
Douglass, Amy Bradfield, et al.. (2013). Does it matter how you deny it?: The role of demeanour in evaluations of criminal suspects. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 21(1). 141–160.
11.
Neuschatz, Jeffrey S., et al.. (2011). The effect of post-identification feedback, delay, and suspicion on accurate eyewitnesses.. Law and Human Behavior. 36(3). 206–214. 12 indexed citations
12.
Neuschatz, Jeffrey S., et al.. (2011). The effect of post-identification feedback, delay, and suspicion on accurate eyewitnesses.. Law and Human Behavior.
13.
Douglass, Amy Bradfield & Eric E. Jones. (2011). Confidence inflation in eyewitnesses: Seeing is not believing. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 18(1). 152–167. 13 indexed citations
14.
Douglass, Amy Bradfield, et al.. (2009). Does post-identification feedback affect evaluations of eyewitness testimony and identification procedures?. Law and Human Behavior. 34(4). 282–294. 27 indexed citations
15.
Douglass, Amy Bradfield, Neil Brewer, & Carolyn Semmler. (2009). Moderators of post‐identification feedback effects on eyewitnesses' memory reports. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 15(2). 279–292. 9 indexed citations
16.
17.
Douglass, Amy Bradfield & Dawn McQuiston‐Surrett. (2006). Post-identification feedback: exploring the effects of sequential photospreads and eyewitnesses' awareness of the identification task. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 20(8). 991–1007. 20 indexed citations
18.
Douglass, Amy Bradfield & Nancy K. Steblay. (2006). Memory distortion in eyewitnesses: a meta-analysis of the post-identification feedback effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 20(7). 859–869. 86 indexed citations
19.
20.
Bornstein, R. A., et al.. (1987). Short-Term Retest Reliability of the Halstead-Reitan Battery in a Normal Sample. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 175(4). 229–232. 49 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026