Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Jen‐Her Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jen‐Her Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jen‐Her Wu more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jen‐Her Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jen‐Her Wu. The network helps show where Jen‐Her Wu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jen‐Her Wu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jen‐Her Wu.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jen‐Her Wu based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jen‐Her Wu. Jen‐Her Wu is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Xu, Xiaoyu, Jen‐Her Wu, Ya-Ting Chang, & Qi Li. (2019). The Investigation of Hedonic Consumption, Impulsive Consumption and Social Sharing in E-commerce Live-streaming Videos.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 43.26 indexed citations
8.
Peng, Lifang, Jen‐Her Wu, Yi-Cheng Chen, Chun Hung Cheng, & Qi Li. (2019). The Performance and Value Creation of E-commerce Ecosystems in Rural China: A Perspective of Systems Theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 215.2 indexed citations
9.
Hsia, Tzyh-Lih, Xiaoyu Xu, Li Qi, et al.. (2018). Consumer Experience Creation in a U-Commerce Environment: An Activity Theory Perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 84.1 indexed citations
Chen, Yi-Cheng, et al.. (2014). FACTORS AFFECTING CONSUMERS’ VALUE CREATION IN ONLINE GROUP BUYING. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. 87.8 indexed citations
12.
Wu, Jen‐Her, et al.. (2009). Why Do Players Stick to a Specific Online Game? The Users and Gratifications Perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 351.5 indexed citations
Wu, Jen‐Her, Yi‐Cheng Chen, & V. Sambamurthy. (2008). The Impacts of BTM Capability and CIO Role Effectiveness on Firms' Information Technology Assimilation: An Empirical Study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 76.12 indexed citations
15.
Wu, Jen‐Her, et al.. (2007). An Extended MDA Method for User Interface Modeling and Transformation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1632–1642.16 indexed citations
16.
Wu, Jen‐Her, et al.. (2006). Core Capabilities for Exploiting Electronic Banking. Journal of electronic commerce research. 7(2). 111.24 indexed citations
Wu, Jen‐Her & Shu-Ching Wang. (2003). An Empirical Study of Consumers Adopting Mobile Commerce in Taiwan: Analyzed by Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 6.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.