JE Osborn

1.5k citations
55 papers · 1.1k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

JE Osborn

46 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

JE Osborn
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Geology 178
  • Space and Planetary Science 30
  • Environmental Engineering 245
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 179
  • Ecology 308
Replace Leon DeBell with:
Leon DeBell United Kingdom
Benjamin Wilkinson United States
Andrej Kobler Slovenia
Jérôme Théau Canada
Jonathan Lisein Belgium
Derya Akkaynak United States
Ángel M. Felicísimo Spain
Mark R. Shortis Australia
Margarita Mulero‐Pázmány Spain
Xiaoqiang Liu China
JE Osborn relative to Leon DeBell United Kingdom Leon DeBell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.4×
Leon DeBell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by JE Osborn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of JE Osborn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by JE Osborn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JE Osborn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by JE Osborn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by JE Osborn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by JE Osborn. The network helps show where JE Osborn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside JE Osborn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with JE Osborn Line = papers co-authored together JE Osborn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997350
2 2015161
3 201063
4 200961
5 200539
6 200134
7 198834
8 197634
9 201029
10 201925
11
The 2010-2011 Learning and Teaching Academic Standards (LTAS) project for Science defined a set of nationally agreed Threshold Learning Outcomes (TLOs) for Australian graduates of bachelor level science degrees
201225
12 201623
13 201918
14 201718
15 201818
16 201817
17 201916
18 200216
19 199714
20 201813

About JE Osborn

JE Osborn is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Environmental Engineering, Geology and Insect Science, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (15 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (11 papers), Forest ecology and management (9 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (7 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (6 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (4 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (3 papers) and Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geology (178 citations), Space and Planetary Science (30 citations), Environmental Engineering (245 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (179 citations) and Ecology (308 citations). JE Osborn has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Arko Lucieer, Steve Harwin, David Ritz, Kerrie M. Swadling, Frank L. Heppner, Charles H. Greene, Julia K. Parrish, Daniel Grünbaum, Leah Edelstein‐Keshet and William L. Romey. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Forestry, Australian Surveyor, Remote Sensing, The Photogrammetric Record and Biofouling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact