Countries where authors publish in Australian Surveyor
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australian Surveyor. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australian Surveyor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian Surveyor more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Australian Surveyor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australian Surveyor.
About Australian Surveyor
The 610 papers published in Australian Surveyor in the last decades have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Australian Surveyor usually cover Geography, Planning and Development (155 papers), Geochemistry and Petrology (60 papers) and Oceanography (105 papers) specifically the topics of Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (102 papers), 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications (101 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (84 papers), Historical Geography and Cartography (81 papers), GNSS positioning and interference (68 papers), Geological Modeling and Analysis (60 papers), Geodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures (50 papers) and 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (43 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australian Surveyor are Al Gore, John F. Morgan, Ian Williamson, W. E. Featherstone, J. M. Rüeger, R.J. Love, Peter Dale, Ahmed El‐Mowafy, Bruce Harvey and A. H. W. Kearsley.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.