Jane Slaughter
Impact in
- Public Administration top 2%
- Labor Movements and Unions
-
- Management and Organizational Studies
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Management Theory and Practice
Papers in
-
- Italian Fascism and Post-war Society 1
- Historical Gender and Feminism Studies 1
- Political theory and Gramsci 1
- Anarchism and Radical Politics 1
-
- Labor Movements and Unions 2
Jane Slaughter
15 papers receiving 317 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Public Administration 147
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 143
- Management Information Systems 72
- Strategy and Management 72
- General Health Professions 67
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Slaughter
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Slaughter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Slaughter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Slaughter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Slaughter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Slaughter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Slaughter. The network helps show where Jane Slaughter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Jane Slaughter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1992 | 282 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 40 | |
| 3 | Working smart : a union guide to participation programs and reengineering | 1994 | 40 |
| 4 | 1990 | 18 | |
| 5 | European Women on the Left: Socialism, Feminism, and the Problems Faced by Political Women, 1880 to the Present | 1981 | 10 |
| 6 | Concessions, and How to Beat Them | 1983 | 9 |
| 7 | 1994 | 7 | |
| 8 | A Troublemaker’s Handbook 2 | 2005 | 4 |
| 9 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 11 | Jane Slaughter Responds | 1996 | 1 |
| 12 | Dealing With Good Management | 1989 | 1 |
| 13 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 1 |
About Jane Slaughter
Jane Slaughter is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Public Administration, Management Information Systems, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 16 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (2 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (1 paper), Occupational Health and Safety Research (1 paper), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (1 paper), Management and Marketing Education (1 paper), Political theory and Gramsci (1 paper), Anarchism and Radical Politics (1 paper) and Organizational Learning and Leadership (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (147 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (143 citations), Management Information Systems (72 citations), Strategy and Management (72 citations) and General Health Professions (67 citations). Jane Slaughter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mike Parker and Don Wells. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Review, Journal of Modern Italian Studies, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Science as Culture and Labor Studies in Working-Class History of the Americas.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.