Monthly Review

2.5k papers and 18.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in Monthly Review in the last decades have received a total of 18.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Monthly Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (615 papers), Political Science and International Relations (252 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (75 papers) specifically the topics of Political Economy and Marxism (230 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (59 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (47 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Monthly Review are Harry Braverman, John Bellamy Foster, André Gunder Frank, Paul M. Sweezy, Robert W. McChesney, Samir Amin, Fred Magdoff, Miguel A. Altieri, W. Tabb and Margaret Lowe Benston.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Monthly Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Monthly Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Monthly Review.

Countries where authors publish in Monthly Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Monthly Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Monthly Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Monthly Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025