China Williams

400 citations
8 papers · 102 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

China Williams

6 papers receiving 95 citations

Peers

China Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 45
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 23
  • Ecological Modeling 7
  • Microbiology 1
  • Horticulture 1
Replace Perdita Pohle with:
Perdita Pohle Germany
Julie Peacock United Kingdom
Meelis Teder Estonia
Bill Hardy
Adam J. M. Devenish United Kingdom
Fernando Sáenz-Ségura Costa Rica
Othman Llewellyn United Kingdom
Kalifa Coulibaly Burkina Faso
Kingsley Kofi Arthur Ghana
Floor Fleurke Netherlands
China Williams relative to Perdita Pohle Germany Perdita Pohle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.5×
Perdita Pohle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by China Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of China Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by China Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites China Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by China Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by China Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by China Williams. The network helps show where China Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside China Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with China Williams Line = papers co-authored together China Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1
An explanatory guide to the Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit-sharing
201246
2 202019
3 202115
4 202214
5 20235
6
An Explanatory Guide to the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing (Chinese version)
20133
7
Guide explicatif du Protocole de Nagoya sur l'accès et le partage des avantages
20140
8 20260

About China Williams

China Williams is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 102 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Maritime Law Issues (4 papers), International Environmental Law and Policies (3 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (1 paper), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (1 paper), Genetic diversity and population structure (1 paper), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1 paper), Environmental Conservation and Management (1 paper) and Plant and animal studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (45 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (23 citations), Ecological Modeling (7 citations), Microbiology (1 citation) and Horticulture (1 citation). China Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Greiber, Natasha Ali, Carly Cowell, Alexandre Antonelli, Paul Kersey, Michael Way, William J. Baker, Paul Wilkin, James S. Borrell and Richard J. A. Buggs. Their work appears in journals such as Plants People Planet, Biodiversity and Conservation, Sustainability and IUCN eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact