Jane Montgomery

72 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Jane Montgomery
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Clinical Biochemistry 227
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 297
  • Neurology 105
  • Physiology 53
  • Molecular Biology 740
Replace Sebastiano Colombatto with:
Sebastiano Colombatto Italy
John S. Hothersall United Kingdom
Johannes Meiser Luxembourg
Yoshiyuki Kubo Japan
BethAnn McLaughlin United States
Alfeu Zanotto‐Filho Brazil
J Emerit France
Karl Morten United Kingdom
Ghassan J. Maghzal Australia
Jane Montgomery relative to Sebastiano Colombatto Italy Sebastiano Colombatto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Sebastiano Colombatto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Montgomery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Montgomery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Montgomery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Montgomery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Montgomery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Montgomery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Montgomery. The network helps show where Jane Montgomery may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Montgomery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Montgomery Line = papers co-authored together Jane Montgomery links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003235
2 1980194
3 2008106
4 198691
5 198389
6 199370
7 199661
8 198859
9 199556
10 200544
11 200143
12 200041
13 200440
14 199435
15
Biochemical correlates of responsiveness and collateral sensitivity of some methotrexate-resistant murine tumors to the lipophilic antifolate, metoprine.
198235
16 200430
17 198926
18 200625
19 198324
20 198524

About Jane Montgomery

Jane Montgomery is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Clinical Biochemistry, Physiology, Spectroscopy and Organic Chemistry, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (20 papers), Biochemical and Molecular Research (11 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (9 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (8 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (7 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (227 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (297 citations), Neurology (105 citations), Physiology (53 citations) and Molecular Biology (740 citations). Jane Montgomery has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Line Ste‐Marie, Orval Mamer, Luc Vachon, James R. Piper, Christine Des Rosiers, Abbas F. Sadikot, Pepijn van den Munckhof, Chantal Bémeur, Henri Brunengraber and Kelvin C. Luk. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Mass Spectrometry, Analytical Biochemistry, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Free Radical Biology and Medicine and Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact