David Beard

21.0k total citations · 6 hit papers
328 papers, 13.8k citations indexed

About

David Beard is a scholar working on Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, David Beard has authored 328 papers receiving a total of 13.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 247 papers in Surgery, 40 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and 26 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in David Beard's work include Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (175 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (134 papers) and Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (93 papers). David Beard is often cited by papers focused on Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (175 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (134 papers) and Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (93 papers). David Beard collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. David Beard's co-authors include David W. Murray, Andrew Price, Andrew Carr, Hemant Pandit, Jill Dawson, Andrew Judge, H.S. Gill, Nigel Arden, Ray Fitzpatrick and C. A. F. Dodd and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Angewandte Chemie International Edition and Circulation.

In The Last Decade

David Beard

315 papers receiving 13.3k citations

Hit Papers

The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores 2007 2026 2013 2019 2007 2012 2017 2018 2014 250 500 750 1000

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Beard United Kingdom 63 10.9k 1.9k 1.5k 1.4k 592 328 13.8k
Thomas P. Vail United States 59 11.4k 1.0× 1.2k 0.6× 1.4k 0.9× 1.8k 1.3× 266 0.4× 173 14.1k
Harry E. Rubash United States 71 14.8k 1.4× 1.8k 0.9× 3.0k 2.0× 1.1k 0.8× 288 0.5× 269 17.7k
Michael A. Mont United States 65 14.4k 1.3× 984 0.5× 1.1k 0.7× 863 0.6× 299 0.5× 563 15.7k
Robert L. Barrack United States 73 13.6k 1.2× 1.8k 0.9× 2.4k 1.6× 882 0.6× 525 0.9× 335 16.3k
John J. Callaghan United States 81 18.5k 1.7× 2.0k 1.1× 989 0.7× 871 0.6× 529 0.9× 415 20.7k
Robert B. Bourne Canada 73 15.8k 1.4× 1.0k 0.5× 1.4k 0.9× 2.0k 1.5× 761 1.3× 230 17.6k
Rob G. H. H. Nelissen Netherlands 59 9.6k 0.9× 1.6k 0.8× 1.3k 0.9× 2.8k 2.0× 996 1.7× 566 14.0k
Stephen E. Graves Australia 52 8.7k 0.8× 532 0.3× 1.7k 1.2× 1.7k 1.2× 577 1.0× 278 13.1k
Charlotte Ekdahl Sweden 41 4.9k 0.4× 1.8k 1.0× 1.2k 0.8× 2.0k 1.4× 1.7k 2.9× 102 8.7k
Søren Overgaard Denmark 54 7.4k 0.7× 933 0.5× 1.8k 1.2× 664 0.5× 277 0.5× 399 9.9k

Countries citing papers authored by David Beard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Beard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Beard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Beard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Beard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Beard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Beard. The network helps show where David Beard may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Beard

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Beard. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Beard based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Beard. David Beard is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
David‐Tchouda, Sandra, et al.. (2024). The health economic analysis of surgery versus rehabilitation in non-traumatic musculoskeletal shoulder disorders: A systematic review of trial-based studies. Clinical Rehabilitation. 39(2). 139–152. 3 indexed citations
3.
Sabah, Shiraz A., Ruth Knight, Philippa Nicolson, et al.. (2023). Epidemiology of revision hip replacement surgery in the UK over the past 15 years—an analysis from the National Joint Registry. BMJ Open. 13(10). e072462–e072462. 5 indexed citations
4.
Harrison, Conrad, Constantin Yves Plessen, Gregor Liegl, et al.. (2023). Item response theory assumptions were adequately met by the Oxford hip and knee scores. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 158. 166–176. 7 indexed citations
5.
Cousins, Sian, Katy Chalmers, Marion Campbell, et al.. (2023). How do pilot and feasibility studies inform randomised placebo-controlled trials in surgery? A systematic review. BMJ Open. 13(11). e071094–e071094. 2 indexed citations
6.
Clark, Laura, Catherine Arundel, Elizabeth Coleman, et al.. (2022). The PROMoting the USE of SWATs (PROMETHEUS) programme: Lessons learnt and future developments for SWATs. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 3(4). 100–106. 9 indexed citations
7.
Martino, Enrico De, Julie A. Hides, James M. Elliott, et al.. (2021). Lumbar muscle atrophy and increased relative intramuscular lipid concentration are not mitigated by daily artificial gravity after 60-day head-down tilt bed rest. Journal of Applied Physiology. 131(1). 356–368. 15 indexed citations
8.
Prats‐Uribe, Albert, Spyros Kolovos, Klára Berencsi, et al.. (2021). Unicompartmental compared with total knee replacement for patients with multimorbidities: a cohort study using propensity score stratification and inverse probability weighting. Health Technology Assessment. 25(66). 1–126. 5 indexed citations
9.
10.
11.
Littlewood, Chris, Julia Wade, Martyn Lewis, et al.. (2021). Protocol for a multi-site pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial: Surgery versus PhysiothErapist-leD exercise for traumatic tears of the rotator cuff (the SPeEDy study). Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 7(1). 17–17. 2 indexed citations
12.
Jain, Abhilash, Matthew D. Gardiner, Jonathan Cook, et al.. (2020). The Oxford Finger Nail Appearance Score - a new scoring system for fingernail deformity following paediatric finger tip trauma. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 74(1). 94–100. 2 indexed citations
13.
Barker, Karen, Ruth Knight, Susan Dutton, et al.. (2020). Outpatient physiotherapy versus home-based rehabilitation for patients at risk of poor outcomes after knee arthroplasty: CORKA RCT. Health Technology Assessment. 24(65). 1–116. 18 indexed citations
14.
16.
Abram, Simon, Andrew Judge, David Beard, Hannah Wilson, & Andrew Price. (2018). Temporal trends and regional variation in the rate of arthroscopic knee surgery in England: analysis of over 1.7 million procedures between 1997 and 2017. Has practice changed in response to new evidence?. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 53(24). 1533–1538. 53 indexed citations
17.
Murphy, Richard, K Kliskey, Kim Wheway, et al.. (2013). Short term tissue response to current treatments for rotator cuff tendinopathy. International Journal of Experimental Pathology. 94. 1 indexed citations
18.
Hossain, Munier, et al.. (2011). Does pre-operative psychological distress affect patient satisfaction after primary total hip arthroplasty?. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 12(1). 122–122. 25 indexed citations
19.
Beard, David, et al.. (2007). A Simple Technique to Remove a Bent Femoral Intramedullary Nail and Broken Interlocking Screw. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 63(2). 435–438. 18 indexed citations
20.
Price, Andrew, et al.. (2002). Dislocation of the bearing of the Oxford lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume. 84-B(5). 653–657. 41 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026