Claude Roux

14.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
351 papers, 8.3k citations indexed

About

Claude Roux is a scholar working on Safety Research, Genetics and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Claude Roux has authored 351 papers receiving a total of 8.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 104 papers in Safety Research, 101 papers in Genetics and 48 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Claude Roux's work include Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (102 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (92 papers) and Digital and Cyber Forensics (37 papers). Claude Roux is often cited by papers focused on Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (102 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (92 papers) and Digital and Cyber Forensics (37 papers). Claude Roux collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Switzerland and France. Claude Roux's co-authors include Chris Lennard, Philip Maynard, Olivier Ribaux, François Lutzoni, Alison Beavis, Xanthe Spindler, Valérie Reeb, Andrew M. McDonagh, Marie Morelato and K. Paul Kirkbride and has published in prestigious journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Chemistry of Materials and Analytical Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Claude Roux

339 papers receiving 7.8k citations

Hit Papers

The Sydney declaration – Revisiting the essence of forens... 2022 2026 2023 2024 2022 25 50 75

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Claude Roux Australia 49 2.7k 2.7k 1.1k 1.0k 1.0k 351 8.3k
Young‐Jin Lee South Korea 45 251 0.1× 389 0.1× 2.5k 2.3× 48 0.0× 1.3k 1.3× 510 9.1k
Bruce Budowle United States 61 260 0.1× 10.4k 3.9× 9.5k 8.6× 1.3k 1.2× 565 0.5× 560 15.0k
Pierre Margot Switzerland 36 1.5k 0.5× 1.4k 0.5× 520 0.5× 506 0.5× 19 0.0× 103 4.0k
James Robertson Australia 33 217 0.1× 857 0.3× 723 0.7× 333 0.3× 198 0.2× 172 2.7k
K. Paul Kirkbride Australia 38 673 0.2× 904 0.3× 765 0.7× 344 0.3× 39 0.0× 190 4.7k
John M. Butler United States 55 112 0.0× 4.6k 1.7× 4.8k 4.4× 524 0.5× 239 0.2× 260 10.4k
Peter Gill Norway 43 218 0.1× 5.3k 2.0× 4.4k 4.0× 673 0.7× 246 0.2× 143 7.2k
Walther Parson Austria 67 99 0.0× 8.2k 3.0× 9.1k 8.2× 1.7k 1.6× 409 0.4× 433 15.8k
Elizabeth Pennisi United States 36 148 0.1× 1.3k 0.5× 2.9k 2.6× 31 0.0× 971 0.9× 656 6.5k
Christophe Champod Switzerland 37 1.7k 0.6× 1.9k 0.7× 342 0.3× 367 0.4× 29 0.0× 128 3.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Claude Roux

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Claude Roux's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claude Roux with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claude Roux more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Claude Roux

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claude Roux. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claude Roux. The network helps show where Claude Roux may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claude Roux

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claude Roux. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claude Roux based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Claude Roux. Claude Roux is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Roux, Claude, et al.. (2025). The persistence of fibres following a choreographed assault: A quantitative assessment of the influence of physical activity. Science & Justice. 65(2). 103–118. 1 indexed citations
2.
Brown, Jared A, Edmund Silins, Mark J. Bartlett, et al.. (2025). Investigating drug trends among people who inject drugs: Temporal, geographical and operational analyses of used syringes in Sydney, Australia. International Journal of Drug Policy. 140. 104803–104803. 2 indexed citations
3.
Nielsen, Suzanne, Monica J. Barratt, Mark J. Bartlett, et al.. (2023). Monitoring for fentanyl within Australian supervised injecting facilities: Findings from feasibility testing of novel methods and collaborative workshops. International Journal of Drug Policy. 115. 104015–104015. 10 indexed citations
4.
Gassner, Anne‐Laure, et al.. (2022). The relevance of gunshot residues in forensic science. IRIS. 5(1). 24 indexed citations
5.
Morelato, Marie, et al.. (2019). Review of the most common chemometric techniques in illicit drug profiling. Forensic Science International. 302. 109911–109911. 47 indexed citations
6.
Maynard, Philip, et al.. (2019). Forensic gait analysis — Morphometric assessment from surveillance footage. Forensic Science International. 296. 57–66. 9 indexed citations
7.
Chadwick, Scott, K. Paul Kirkbride, Anne‐Laure Gassner, et al.. (2019). An investigation on the secondary transfer of organic gunshot residues. Science & Justice. 59(3). 248–255. 12 indexed citations
8.
Roux, Claude, et al.. (2018). Forensic image analysis – CCTV distortion and artefacts. Forensic Science International. 285. 77–85. 23 indexed citations
9.
Casey, Eoghan, Olivier Ribaux, & Claude Roux. (2018). Digital transformations and the viability of forensic science laboratories: Crisis-opportunity through decentralisation. Forensic Science International. 289. e24–e25. 10 indexed citations
10.
Morelato, Marie, et al.. (2018). Forensic drug intelligence and the rise of cryptomarkets. Part II: Combination of data from the physical and virtual markets. Forensic Science International. 288. 201–210. 9 indexed citations
11.
Moret, Sébastien, et al.. (2018). An effective Physical Developer (PD) method for use in Australian laboratories. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 1–6. 6 indexed citations
12.
Roux, Claude, Olivier Ribaux, & Frank Crispino. (2018). Forensic science 2020 – the end of the crossroads?. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 50(6). 607–618. 21 indexed citations
13.
Chadwick, Scott, et al.. (2018). Impact of one-step luminescent cyanoacrylate treatment on subsequent DNA analysis. Forensic Science International. 286. 1–7. 8 indexed citations
14.
Kirkbride, K. Paul, et al.. (2018). A forensic investigation on the persistence of organic gunshot residues. Forensic Science International. 292. 1–10. 32 indexed citations
15.
Morelato, Marie, et al.. (2017). The use of handwriting examinations beyond the traditional court purpose. Science & Justice. 57(5). 394–400. 7 indexed citations
16.
Morelato, Marie, et al.. (2017). Using handwriting to infer a writer’s country of origin for forensic intelligence purposes. Forensic Science International. 282. 144–156. 7 indexed citations
17.
Ribaux, Olivier, Claude Roux, & Frank Crispino. (2016). Expressing the value of forensic science in policing. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 49(5). 489–501. 24 indexed citations
18.
Spindler, Xanthe, et al.. (2014). Synthesis and application of an aqueous nile red microemulsion for the development of fingermarks on porous surfaces. Forensic Science International. 244. e48–e55. 8 indexed citations
19.
Blanes, Lucas, et al.. (2014). The application of portable microchip electrophoresis for the screening and comparative analysis of synthetic cathinone seizures. Forensic Science International. 242. 16–23. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026