Heather Jones

471 total citations
18 papers, 357 citations indexed

About

Heather Jones is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Heather Jones has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 357 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 7 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 6 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Heather Jones's work include Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (12 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (7 papers) and Folate and B Vitamins Research (6 papers). Heather Jones is often cited by papers focused on Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (12 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (7 papers) and Folate and B Vitamins Research (6 papers). Heather Jones collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Heather Jones's co-authors include Rochelle Watkins, Carol Bower, Raewyn Mutch, Janet M Payne, Amanda Wilkins, Anne McKenzie, Elizabeth Elliott, Jane Latimer, Lucy Burns and James Fitzpatrick and has published in prestigious journals such as The FASEB Journal, BMJ Open and BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

In The Last Decade

Heather Jones

18 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Heather Jones Australia 10 200 126 113 52 50 18 357
Amanda Wilkins Australia 10 230 1.1× 161 1.3× 109 1.0× 41 0.8× 109 2.2× 15 441
Astrid Alvik Norway 10 384 1.9× 127 1.0× 216 1.9× 79 1.5× 147 2.9× 14 497
Astrid Berg South Africa 8 170 0.8× 41 0.3× 109 1.0× 82 1.6× 150 3.0× 23 625
Susanne Grylka‐Baeschlin Switzerland 13 213 1.1× 81 0.6× 294 2.6× 110 2.1× 235 4.7× 36 540
Zahra Abedian Iran 11 85 0.4× 48 0.4× 110 1.0× 27 0.5× 160 3.2× 42 313
Ue‐Lin Chung Taiwan 11 101 0.5× 60 0.5× 66 0.6× 28 0.5× 101 2.0× 25 411
Ellise D. Adams United States 8 138 0.7× 30 0.2× 130 1.2× 54 1.0× 106 2.1× 25 304
Theresa Kim Canada 13 264 1.3× 106 0.8× 220 1.9× 64 1.2× 308 6.2× 25 584
Roghieh Kharaghani Iran 12 100 0.5× 50 0.4× 131 1.2× 20 0.4× 161 3.2× 42 379
Farzaneh Zaheri Iran 9 122 0.6× 18 0.1× 71 0.6× 32 0.6× 79 1.6× 28 315

Countries citing papers authored by Heather Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heather Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heather Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heather Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heather Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heather Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heather Jones. The network helps show where Heather Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Heather Jones

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Heather Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Heather Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Heather Jones. Heather Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Jones, Heather, et al.. (2024). Using digital communication tools to improve interprofessional collaboration and satisfaction in a student-run free clinic. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. 37(7). 413–421. 3 indexed citations
3.
Jones, Heather, et al.. (2023). Integrating Telehealth: Curricular Mapping to New Standards in Nurse Practitioner Post-baccalaureate Doctor of Nursing Practice Programs. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners. 19(5). 104576–104576. 2 indexed citations
4.
Watkins, Rochelle, et al.. (2022). Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders screening tools: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 122. 104168–104168. 11 indexed citations
5.
Jones, Heather, et al.. (2021). Barriers to Screening for Adverse Childhood Experiences. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners. 18(2). 190–194. 5 indexed citations
6.
Finlay‐Jones, Amy, Elizabeth Elliott, Tracy Reibel, et al.. (2020). Community Priority setting for Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder Research in Australia. International Journal for Population Data Science. 5(3). 1359–1359. 9 indexed citations
7.
McKenzie, Anne, Carol Bower, Elizabeth Elliott, et al.. (2018). Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder Priority Setting Partnership Report. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA). 1 indexed citations
8.
Mutch, Raewyn, Heather Jones, Carol Bower, & Rochelle Watkins. (2016). Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders: Using Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice of Justice Professionals to Support their Educational Needs.. PubMed. 23(1). e77–89. 18 indexed citations
9.
Watkins, Rochelle, Janet M Payne, Tracy Reibel, et al.. (2015). Development of a scale to evaluate midwives’ beliefs about assessing alcohol use during pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 15(1). 353–353. 14 indexed citations
10.
Watkins, Rochelle, Elizabeth Elliott, Amanda Wilkins, et al.. (2014). Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: development of consensus referral criteria for specialist diagnostic assessment in Australia. BMC Pediatrics. 14(1). 178–178. 5 indexed citations
11.
Payne, Janet M, Rochelle Watkins, Heather Jones, et al.. (2014). Midwives' knowledge, attitudes and practice about alcohol exposure and the risk of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 14(1). 377–377. 44 indexed citations
12.
Jones, Heather, et al.. (2014). Inhibition of KCa3.1 decreases differentiated osteoclast function in RAW264 cells (893.21). The FASEB Journal. 28(S1). 1 indexed citations
13.
Watkins, Rochelle, Elizabeth Elliott, Jane Halliday, et al.. (2013). A modified Delphi study of screening for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in Australia. BMC Pediatrics. 13(1). 13–13. 26 indexed citations
14.
Watkins, Rochelle, Elizabeth Elliott, Amanda Wilkins, et al.. (2013). Recommendations from a consensus development workshop on the diagnosis of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in Australia. BMC Pediatrics. 13(1). 156–156. 28 indexed citations
15.
Jones, Heather, Anne McKenzie, Elizabeth Russell, et al.. (2013). Involving consumers and the community in the development of a diagnostic instrument for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in Australia. Health Research Policy and Systems. 11(1). 26–26. 5 indexed citations
16.
Watkins, Rochelle, Elizabeth Elliott, Raewyn Mutch, et al.. (2012). Consensus diagnostic criteria for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in Australia: a modified Delphi study. BMJ Open. 2(5). e001918–e001918. 53 indexed citations
17.
Watkins, Rochelle, Elizabeth Elliott, Raewyn Mutch, et al.. (2012). Health professionals’ perceptions about the adoption of existing guidelines for the diagnosis of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in Australia. BMC Pediatrics. 12(1). 69–69. 94 indexed citations
18.
Jones, W. Paul, et al.. (2008). Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (Anam) and Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Ability: A Concurrent Validity Study. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 22(2). 305–320. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026