Jane Kellett

44 papers receiving 941 citations

Peers

Jane Kellett
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 23
  • Biological Psychiatry 28
  • Biochemistry 67
  • Human-Computer Interaction 63
  • Rehabilitation 55
Replace Guichen Li with:
Guichen Li China
E. Paul Cherniack United States
Tina Hurst United Kingdom
Christopher R. D’Adamo United States
Elena Urdaneta Spain
Vivian Leung Hong Kong
Zahara Abdul Manaf Malaysia
Raúl Domínguez Spain
Fengqing Zhang United States
Robert J. Matheis United States
Jane Kellett relative to Guichen Li China Guichen Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Guichen Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Kellett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Kellett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Kellett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Kellett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Kellett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Kellett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Kellett. The network helps show where Jane Kellett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Kellett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Kellett Line = papers co-authored together Jane Kellett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019155
2 2017131
3 2018120
4 201853
5 201644
6 202044
7 201644
8 201943
9 201936
10 202028
11 201724
12 200420
13 201917
14 201915
15 202015
16 201614
17 202213
18 200012
19 202010
20 202210

About Jane Kellett

Jane Kellett is a scholar working on Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 46 papers that have together received 957 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nutrition and Health in Aging (8 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (4 papers), Tea Polyphenols and Effects (4 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (2 papers) and Ginkgo biloba and Cashew Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (23 citations), Biological Psychiatry (28 citations), Biochemistry (67 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (63 citations) and Rehabilitation (55 citations). Jane Kellett has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Greece and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Nenad Naumovski, Nathan M. D’Cunha, Ekavi Georgousopoulou, Andrew J. McKune, Duane Mellor, Demosthenes B. Panagiotakos, Stephen Isbel, Jane Frost, Rachel Bacon and Dung Tuan Nguyen. Their work appears in journals such as The journal of nutrition health & aging, Foods, Dementia, Food Research International and Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact