Jane Frost
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Physiology
- Rehabilitation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Nathan M. D’CunhaStephen IsbelJane KellettNenad NaumovskiAndrew J. McKuneDung Tuan NguyenLori DelaneyEkavi Georgousopoulou
- Topics
- Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (9 papers)Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers)Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Advanced NursingGerontology
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jane Frost
22 papers receiving 361 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Psychiatry and Mental health 100
- Human-Computer Interaction 91
- General Health Professions 90
- Physiology 72
- Rehabilitation 71
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Frost
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Frost's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Frost with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Frost more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Frost
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Frost. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Frost. The network helps show where Jane Frost may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Frost
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Frost. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Frost based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Frost. Jane Frost is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 42 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 145 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | University of Canberra implementing augmented reality into nursing education | 4 |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | 37 |
About Jane Frost
Jane Frost is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 25 papers that have together received 375 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (9 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (64 citations), Research and Theory (20 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (91 citations). Jane Frost has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nathan M. D’Cunha, Stephen Isbel, Jane Kellett, Nenad Naumovski, Andrew J. McKune, Dung Tuan Nguyen, Lori Delaney, Ekavi Georgousopoulou, Robert Fitzgerald and Kristen Ranse. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Gerontology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.