Jane Garner

52 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers

Jane Garner
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Library and Information Sciences 101
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 13
  • Clinical Psychology 126
  • Communication 41
  • General Health Professions 135
Replace Mark Winston with:
Mark Winston United States
Daniel Callahan United States
Karen Brown United States
Linda Cooper United Kingdom
Intan Azura Mokhtar Singapore
David Prosser United Kingdom
Jordan Eschler United States
Evan K. Perrault United States
Sarah Clark United States
Alan O’Rourke United Kingdom
Jane Garner relative to Mark Winston United States Mark Winston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Mark Winston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Garner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Garner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Garner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Garner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Garner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Garner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Garner. The network helps show where Jane Garner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Garner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Garner Line = papers co-authored together Jane Garner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002116
2 200443
3 202133
4 202026
5
Television News and Presidential Campaigns: The Legitimization of Televised Political Advertising.
199022
6 199821
7 200119
8 200116
9 200216
10 202115
11 199713
12 200813
13 200312
14 202111
15 202211
16 202010
17 20229
18 20179
19 20239
20 20228

About Jane Garner

Jane Garner is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Information Systems, having authored 59 papers that have together received 547 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Administration (18 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (9 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (4 papers), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (3 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning (3 papers) and Social Work Education and Practice (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (101 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (13 citations), Clinical Psychology (126 citations), Communication (41 citations) and General Health Professions (135 citations). Jane Garner has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Simon Wakeling, Philip Hider, Hamid R. Jamali, Mark Ardern, Sandra Evans, Yazdan Mansourian, Holly Randell‐Moon, Karen Bell, Ruth Porter and Susan Benbow. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, The Library Quarterly, Library Management, Journal of Library Administration and Public Library Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact