Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association

1.8k citations
406 papers · indexed · active since 1951

Impact in

Papers in

Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association

247 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Library and Information Sciences 448
  • Health Informatics 65
  • Communication 180
  • Computer Science Applications 118
  • Information Systems 487
Replace Digital Library Perspectives with:
Digital Library Perspectives United States
Public & Access Services Quarterly United States
Journal of Web Librarianship United States
LIBER Quarterly The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries United Kingdom
Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship United States
Computers in libraries United States
Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian United States
Internet Reference Services Quarterly United States
Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries United States
Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science Malaysia
Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association relative to Digital Library Perspectives United States Digital Library Perspectives's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Digital Library Perspectives · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association.

About Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association

The 406 papers published in Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association in the last decades have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association usually cover Library and Information Sciences (144 papers), Conservation (38 papers), Information Systems (110 papers), Museology (15 papers) and Communication (25 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Administration (107 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (77 papers), Web and Library Services (38 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (36 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (25 papers), Research Data Management Practices (16 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (14 papers) and Museums and Cultural Heritage (14 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association are Colin Steele, Nicole Johnston, Tim Gorichanaz, Catherine Ryan, Bhuva Narayan, Jane Garner, Andrew Cox, Rajan Yadav, Roxanne Missingham and Elizabeth Tait.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact