Jane Fleming

49 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Jane Fleming
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Sensory Systems 276
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 65
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 170
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 177
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 504
Replace Kristen Triebel with:
Kristen Triebel United States
Hidetada Sasaki Japan
Wim Van der Elst Belgium
Alexander Rae‐Grant United States
Antonio Guaita Italy
Jennifer A. Deal United States
Gregory S. Day United States
Takashi Kurosaki Japan
Naoko Sakuma Japan
Kristen Dams-O’Connor United States
Jane Fleming relative to Kristen Triebel United States Kristen Triebel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Kristen Triebel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Fleming

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Fleming's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Fleming with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Fleming more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Fleming

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Fleming. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Fleming. The network helps show where Jane Fleming may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Fleming, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Fleming Line = papers co-authored together Jane Fleming links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998245
2 2008204
3 2017184
4 2017178
5 2009145
6 2011123
7 1997117
8 2013101
9 201676
10 200867
11 200746
12 201344
13 201041
14 201740
15 201428
16 201726
17 201926
18 201025
19 201924
20 201523

About Jane Fleming

Jane Fleming is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Health and Sensory Systems, having authored 52 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (16 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (10 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (8 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (7 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (7 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (5 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (276 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (65 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (170 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (177 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (504 citations). Jane Fleming has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Carol Brayne, Fiona E. Matthews, Karen P. Steel, Steve D. M. Brown, Stephen Barclay, Morag Farquhar, Jun Zhao, James Walsh, Tim Self and M.C. Mahony. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, BMC Geriatrics, Aging & Mental Health, Archives of Osteoporosis and Emergency Medicine Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact