Archives of Osteoporosis

1.3k papers and 19.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Archives of Osteoporosis in the last decades have received a total of 19.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Archives of Osteoporosis usually cover Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (987 papers), Surgery (645 papers) and Oncology (231 papers) specifically the topics of Bone health and osteoporosis research (947 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (524 papers) and Bone health and treatments (203 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archives of Osteoporosis are Cyrus Cooper, John А. Kanis, Eugène McCloskey, J Stenmark, J. A. Kanis, J. Compston, M Ivergård, E Hernlund, E. V. McCloskey and A Svedbom.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Archives of Osteoporosis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Archives of Osteoporosis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archives of Osteoporosis.

Countries where authors publish in Archives of Osteoporosis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archives of Osteoporosis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archives of Osteoporosis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archives of Osteoporosis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025