Sarah Cullum
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Physiology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Nadja SmailagicIngrid Arévalo-RodríguezOlga Lucía PedrazaMarta Roqué i FigulsAgustín CiapponiXavier BonfillCarol BrayneSam Creavin
- Topics
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (48 papers)Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (16 papers)Health disparities and outcomes (13 papers)
- Cited by
- Psychiatry and Mental healthGeriatrics and GerontologyNeuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Journals
- The LancetSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Sarah Cullum
79 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.4k
- General Health Professions 446
- Physiology 433
- Cognitive Neuroscience 359
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 344
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Cullum
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Cullum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Cullum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Cullum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Cullum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Cullum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Cullum. The network helps show where Sarah Cullum may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Cullum
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Cullum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Cullum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Cullum. Sarah Cullum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 75 | |
| 18 | 49 | |
| 19 | 90 | |
| 20 | Deliberate self harm: the hidden population. | 2 |
About Sarah Cullum
Sarah Cullum is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Family Practice, having authored 84 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (48 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (16 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (1.4k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (344 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (81 citations). Sarah Cullum has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Nadja Smailagic, Ingrid Arévalo-Rodríguez, Olga Lucía Pedraza, Marta Roqué i Figuls, Agustín Ciapponi, Xavier Bonfill, Carol Brayne, Sam Creavin, Anna H Noel-Storr and Daniel Davis. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.