Andrew Forge

11.0k total citations
131 papers, 8.2k citations indexed

About

Andrew Forge is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Molecular Biology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Forge has authored 131 papers receiving a total of 8.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 92 papers in Sensory Systems, 61 papers in Molecular Biology and 24 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Andrew Forge's work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (90 papers), Connexins and lens biology (26 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (23 papers). Andrew Forge is often cited by papers focused on Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (90 papers), Connexins and lens biology (26 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (23 papers). Andrew Forge collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Andrew Forge's co-authors include Graham Nevill, Jochen Schacht, Ruth Taylor, Daniel J. Jagger, James V. Corwin, Lin Li, Stefano O. Casalotti, Lei Li, Su-Hua Sha and Paul R. Lambert and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Clinical Investigation.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Forge

128 papers receiving 8.1k citations

Peers

Andrew Forge
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Sensory Systems 5.8k
  • Molecular Biology 3.5k
  • Neurology 1.8k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.7k
  • Otorhinolaryngology 706
Replace Guy P. Richardson with:
Guy P. Richardson United Kingdom
Andrew J. Griffith United States
Allen F. Ryan United States
Bradley A. Schulte United States
Thomas R. Van De Water United States
Karen B. Avraham Israel
Jeffrey R. Holt United States
Stefan Heller United States
Peter G. Gillespie United States
Corné J. Kros United Kingdom
Guy P. Richardson United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Andrew Forge
Andrew Forge · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Andrew Forge
Andrew Forge · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Forge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Forge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Forge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Forge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Forge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Forge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Forge. The network helps show where Andrew Forge may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Forge

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Forge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Forge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Forge. Andrew Forge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 51
2 248
3 45
4 29
5 45
6 27
7 81
8 38
9 41
10 31
11 68
12 260
13 205
14 214
15 11
16 492
17
Psychophysical and physiological advances in hearing
188
18 417
19 2
20 5

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026