Naoko Sakuma
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Health top 2%
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 1%
- Physiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Yoshinori FujiwaraShoji ShinkaiHiroki InagakiMasashi YasunagaSumiko SasanumaMika SugiyamaChiaki UraHiroyuki Suzuki
- Topics
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (15 papers)Health disparities and outcomes (10 papers)Frailty in Older Adults (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaApplied Physics LettersPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- JapanCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Naoko Sakuma
66 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
- Psychiatry and Mental health 500
- Cognitive Neuroscience 312
- Health 278
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 278
- Physiology 228
Countries citing papers authored by Naoko Sakuma
This map shows the geographic impact of Naoko Sakuma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naoko Sakuma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naoko Sakuma more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Naoko Sakuma
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naoko Sakuma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naoko Sakuma. The network helps show where Naoko Sakuma may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naoko Sakuma
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naoko Sakuma. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naoko Sakuma based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naoko Sakuma. Naoko Sakuma is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 49 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 68 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | Reliability and validity of the Five Cognitive Test in the context of detecting older people with mild cognitive impairment living in the community | 7 |
| 14 | 33 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 411 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | [An intergenerational health promotion program involving older adults in urban areas. "Research of Productivity by Intergenerational Sympathy (REPRINTS)": first-year experience and short-term effects]. | 16 |
| 20 | 125 |
About Naoko Sakuma
Naoko Sakuma is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (15 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (10 papers) and Frailty in Older Adults (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (189 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (278 citations) and Health (278 citations). Naoko Sakuma has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yoshinori Fujiwara, Shoji Shinkai, Hiroki Inagaki, Masashi Yasunaga, Sumiko Sasanuma, Mika Sugiyama, Chiaki Ura, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Mutsuo Ijuin and Shinobu Masaki. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Applied Physics Letters and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.