Jane Ebert

953 citations
15 papers · 647 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Ebert

15 papers receiving 600 citations

Peers

Jane Ebert
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • General Decision Sciences 254
  • Applied Psychology 172
  • Marketing 117
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 15
  • Social Psychology 124
Replace Jonathan M. Meyers with:
Jonathan M. Meyers United States
Deborah A. Kermer United States
Kristen J. Klaaren United States
Mary Steffel United States
Todd McElroy United States
Dalia L. Diab United States
Minjung Koo United States
Matthew N. McMullen United States
Maxim Milyavsky Israel
Ginger L. Pennington United States
Jane Ebert relative to Jonathan M. Meyers United States Jonathan M. Meyers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jonathan M. Meyers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Ebert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Ebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Ebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Ebert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Ebert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Ebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Ebert. The network helps show where Jane Ebert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Jane Ebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Ebert Line = papers co-authored together Jane Ebert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 20242
2 201835
3 201419
4 20124
5 20111
6
Affective Forecasting and Psychological Distance: the Surprising Impact of Distant Events
20091
7 200911
8 200919
9
The Special Fragility of Time: Time-Insensitivity and Valuation of Near and Far Future
20081
10 200887
11 2007187
12
Special Session Summary Psychological Approaches to Future Rewards: Sequences, Valuation, Effort, and Frequency Programs
20031
13 2002239
14 200218
15 200122

About Jane Ebert

Jane Ebert is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Marketing and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 647 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (3 papers), Physical Activity and Health (2 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (2 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (1 paper), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper) and Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (254 citations), Applied Psychology (172 citations), Marketing (117 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (15 citations) and Social Psychology (124 citations). Jane Ebert has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Daniel T. Gilbert, Dražen Prelec, Tom Meyvis, Raphaëlle Lambert-Pandraud, Étienne Mullet, Aimée Drolet, Michael I. Norton, Ellen Peters, Angela Gutchess and Margie E. Lachman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychology and Health, Management Science and Annals of Behavioral Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026