Renaissance Studies

868 papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 868 papers published in Renaissance Studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Renaissance Studies usually cover History (534 papers), Classics (199 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (141 papers) specifically the topics of Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (241 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (185 papers) and Historical Influence and Diplomacy (98 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Renaissance Studies are Brian Vickers, Elaine Leong, Peter Burke, Vivian Nutton, Elizabeth S. Cohen, David Fallows, Evelyn Welch, Sharon T. Strocchia, Mary Rogers and Gianna Pomata.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Renaissance Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Renaissance Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Renaissance Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Renaissance Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Renaissance Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Renaissance Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renaissance Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025