Jane Cooper
Impact in
- Neurology top 5%
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Neurological diseases and metabolism
- Physiology top 5%
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Papers in
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 5
- Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior 3
- Co-authors
- Michael J. O’NeillTracey K. MurrayMichael HuttonZeshan AhmedAnnalisa CavalliniMichel GoedertSuchira BoseSamuel J. Jackson
- Journals
- European Journal of Pharmacology (3 papers)Steroids (2 papers)Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters (2 papers)Molecular Therapy (1 paper)Experimental Neurology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Jane Cooper
17 papers receiving 901 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Neurology 186
- Physiology 420
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 247
- Neurology 140
- Biological Psychiatry 22
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Cooper
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Cooper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Cooper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Cooper. The network helps show where Jane Cooper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 120 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 110 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 364 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 34 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 25 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 39 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 53 | |
| 13 | 1987 | 87 | |
| 14 | 1970 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1968 | 20 | |
| 16 | The metabolism of melengestrol acetate. | 1967 | 11 |
| 17 | 1965 | 22 |
About Jane Cooper
Jane Cooper is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Pharmacology, Neurology and Molecular Biology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 924 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms (2 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (2 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (186 citations), Physiology (420 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (247 citations), Neurology (140 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (22 citations). Jane Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. O’Neill, Tracey K. Murray, Michael Hutton, Zeshan Ahmed, Annalisa Cavallini, Michel Goedert, Suchira Bose, Samuel J. Jackson, Mark Ward and Markus Tolnay. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmacology, Steroids, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Molecular Therapy and Experimental Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.