Experimental Neurology

14.6k papers and 588.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 14.6k papers published in Experimental Neurology in the last decades have received a total of 588.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Experimental Neurology usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (7.3k papers), Molecular Biology (4.0k papers) and Neurology (2.6k papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3.1k papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2.2k papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1.9k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Experimental Neurology are Lloyd Guth, James B. Ranck, John O’Keefe, Jerry Silver, Dan McIntyre, Graham V. Goddard, Phillip G. Popovich, Wilfrid Rall, Arnold B. Scheibel and Frederick J. Samaha.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Experimental Neurology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Experimental Neurology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Experimental Neurology.

Countries where authors publish in Experimental Neurology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Experimental Neurology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Experimental Neurology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Experimental Neurology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025