Jane Baxter

32 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Jane Baxter
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Management Information Systems 697
  • Public Administration 153
  • Accounting 399
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 333
  • Strategy and Management 293
Replace Jonas Gerdin with:
Jonas Gerdin Sweden
Stuart Ogden United Kingdom
Utz Schäffer Germany
Mathew Tsamenyi United Kingdom
Angelo Ditillo Italy
Anne Loft Sweden
Marilyn Neimark United States
Peter Skærbæk Denmark
Barbara D. Merino United States
Louise Kloot Australia
Jane Baxter relative to Jonas Gerdin Sweden Jonas Gerdin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jonas Gerdin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Baxter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Baxter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Baxter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Baxter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Baxter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Baxter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Baxter. The network helps show where Jane Baxter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Jane Baxter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Baxter Line = papers co-authored together Jane Baxter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003307
2 2006169
3 200898
4
Doing Field Research: Practice and Meta-Theory in Counterpoint
199885
5 199861
6 201857
7 200848
8 201046
9 201537
10 200732
11 200329
12 200522
13 199920
14 201917
15 200114
16 200814
17 20199
18
Management accounting inscriptions and the post-industrial experience of organizational control
20039
19 20216
20 20205

About Jane Baxter

Jane Baxter is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management and Public Administration, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Accounting and Organizational Management (28 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (11 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (10 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (5 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (4 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (4 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (3 papers) and Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (697 citations), Public Administration (153 citations), Accounting (399 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (333 citations) and Strategy and Management (293 citations). Jane Baxter has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Sweden and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Wai Fong Chua, Paul Andon, Linda English, Martin Carlsson‐Wall, Kalle Kraus, Christina Boedker, Habib Mahama, David Emsley, Graham L. Bradley and Jan Mouritsen. Their work appears in journals such as Management Accounting Research, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, Accounting Organizations and Society, Critical Perspectives on Accounting and Journal of Management Accounting Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact