Studies in East European Thought

453 papers and 687 indexed citations i.

About

The 453 papers published in Studies in East European Thought in the last decades have received a total of 687 indexed citations. Papers published in Studies in East European Thought usually cover Sociology and Political Science (211 papers), Philosophy (117 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (70 papers) specifically the topics of Critical Theory and Philosophy (64 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (55 papers) and Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in East European Thought are David Bakhurst, Dmitry Shlapentokh, Attila Ágh, Claus Offe, Елена Здравомыслова, Sergei Prozorov, Анна Темкина, Slavoj Žižek, Claus Zittel and Jan Woleński.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studies in East European Thought

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in East European Thought. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in East European Thought.

Countries where authors publish in Studies in East European Thought

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in East European Thought. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in East European Thought with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in East European Thought more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025