Mathieu Marion

57 papers receiving 632 citations

Peers

Mathieu Marion
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Philosophy 140
  • Theoretical Computer Science 13
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 134
  • History and Philosophy of Science 36
  • Clinical Biochemistry 52
Replace Carolyn D. Williams with:
Carolyn D. Williams United States
Adam Deutsch Sweden
Sandra E. Graham Canada
Christina Justenhoven Germany
Simon C. Gamble United Kingdom
Stephen D. Barnard United States
Kazushi Okada Japan
Étienne Blanc France
D. G. Keyes United States
Jill Mwenifumbo Canada
Mathieu Marion relative to Carolyn D. Williams United States Carolyn D. Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×22.3×
Carolyn D. Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mathieu Marion

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathieu Marion's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathieu Marion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathieu Marion more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mathieu Marion

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathieu Marion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathieu Marion. The network helps show where Mathieu Marion may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mathieu Marion, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mathieu Marion Line = papers co-authored together Mathieu Marion links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200190
2 200462
3 199346
4 199542
5 200638
6 198533
7 200133
8 199028
9 200026
10 199021
11 199420
12 199419
13 200819
14 198718
15 201717
16 199014
17 200913
18 200012
19 200511
20
The Golden Age of Polish Philosophy: Kazimierz Twardowski's Philosophical Legacy
20097

About Mathieu Marion

Mathieu Marion is a scholar working on Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 64 papers that have together received 679 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (17 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (7 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (6 papers), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (5 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (4 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (4 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (140 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (13 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (134 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (36 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (52 citations). Mathieu Marion has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Francine Denizeau, Linda L. Pritchard, Roger Ferreira, Annick Harel‐Bellan, Pietro Mancosu, Philippe Robin, Vincent M. Monnier, Slimane Ait‐Si‐Ali, Chiara Gerhardinger and Irina Naguibneva. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicology, Synthese, History and Philosophy of Logic, Journal of Biological Chemistry and British Journal for the History of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact