Studia Logica

2.2k papers and 17.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Studia Logica in the last decades have received a total of 17.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Studia Logica usually cover Artificial Intelligence (1.4k papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (1.4k papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (140 papers) specifically the topics of Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (1.3k papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (1.1k papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (640 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studia Logica are Janusz Czelakowski, J. Michael Dunn, Dov M. Gabbay, Franco Montagna, Daniele Mundici, Kosta Došen, Johan van Benthem, Dimiter Vakarelov, David Makinson and Heinrich Wansing.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studia Logica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studia Logica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studia Logica.

Countries where authors publish in Studia Logica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studia Logica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studia Logica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studia Logica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025