Ian Rumfitt
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 19
- Philosophy 19
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 10
- Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 4
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 3
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 2
- Co-authors
- Robert Brandom (1 shared paper)Jeff Malpas (1 shared paper)Susanne Bobzien (1 shared paper)Bradley Armour‐Garb (1 shared paper)Timothy Williamson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Mind (6 papers)Grazer Philosophische Studien (3 papers)Philosophy (3 papers)The Philosophical Review (3 papers)Synthese (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesMexico
In The Last Decade
Ian Rumfitt
31 papers receiving 621 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- History and Philosophy of Science 143
- Philosophy 346
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 384
- Theoretical Computer Science 12
- Artificial Intelligence 233
Countries citing papers authored by Ian Rumfitt
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Rumfitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Rumfitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Rumfitt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Rumfitt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Rumfitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Rumfitt. The network helps show where Ian Rumfitt may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Ian Rumfitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 218 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 167 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 49 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 39 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 25 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 24 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 15 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2003 | 5 |
About Ian Rumfitt
Ian Rumfitt is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 40 papers that have together received 751 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (19 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (10 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (4 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (143 citations), Philosophy (346 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (384 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (12 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (233 citations). Ian Rumfitt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Robert Brandom, Jeff Malpas, Susanne Bobzien, Bradley Armour‐Garb and Timothy Williamson. Their work appears in journals such as Mind, Grazer Philosophische Studien, Philosophy, The Philosophical Review and Synthese.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.