James Philpot
Impact in
- Accounting top 5%
- Corporate Finance and Governance
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Gender Politics and Representation
Papers in
-
- Corporate Finance and Governance 8
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 2
- Finance 6
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 6
- Co-authors
- Craig A. Peterson (6 shared papers)James N. Rimbey (3 shared papers)Craig T. Schulman (2 shared papers)K. C. O’Shaughnessy (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Corporate Governance (1 paper)Journal of Business Ethics (1 paper)Financial Review (1 paper)Corporate Governance An International Review (1 paper)Managerial Finance (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James Philpot
10 papers receiving 345 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Accounting 304
- Gender Studies 183
- Finance 104
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 93
- Strategy and Management 65
Countries citing papers authored by James Philpot
This map shows the geographic impact of James Philpot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Philpot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Philpot more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Philpot
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Philpot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Philpot. The network helps show where James Philpot may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside James Philpot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 231 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 39 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 9 | Active Management, Fund Size, and Bond Mutual Fund Returns | 1998 | 5 |
| 10 | The Finance Committee of the Board and Financial Performance: A Resource Dependence Perspective | 2013 | 2 |
| 11 | 2007 | 0 |
About James Philpot
James Philpot is a scholar working on Accounting, Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies and Strategy and Management, having authored 11 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (8 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (6 papers), Housing Market and Economics (3 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (2 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (2 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (1 paper), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper) and Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (304 citations), Gender Studies (183 citations), Finance (104 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (93 citations) and Strategy and Management (65 citations). James Philpot has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Craig A. Peterson, James N. Rimbey, Craig T. Schulman and K. C. O’Shaughnessy. Their work appears in journals such as Corporate Governance, Journal of Business Ethics, Financial Review, Corporate Governance An International Review and Managerial Finance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.