James M. van Gelder
- Neurology top 5%
- Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications 5
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances 3
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 7
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 7
- Emergency Medicine top 10%
-
- Blood properties and coagulation 6
-
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 2
-
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management 2
-
- Platelet Disorders and Treatments 2
- Co-authors
- Ian A. HarrisMichael J. SolomonJonathan MulfordJane YoungD.P. DhallC.H. NairMark SheridanMatthias Jaeger
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
James M. van Gelder
21 papers receiving 709 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Neurology 302
- Pharmacology 179
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 126
- Emergency Medicine 57
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 29
Countries citing papers authored by James M. van Gelder
This map shows the geographic impact of James M. van Gelder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. van Gelder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. van Gelder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James M. van Gelder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. van Gelder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. van Gelder. The network helps show where James M. van Gelder may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James M. van Gelder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 27 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 67 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 277 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 53 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 204 | |
| 17 | 1996 | 15 | |
| 18 | 1996 | 15 | |
| 19 | 1993 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1993 | 5 |
About James M. van Gelder
James M. van Gelder is a scholar working on Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 744 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (7 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (6 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (5 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (3 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (2 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (2 papers) and Platelet Disorders and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (302 citations), Pharmacology (179 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (126 citations). James M. van Gelder has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ian A. Harris, Michael J. Solomon, Jonathan Mulford, Jane Young, D.P. Dhall, C.H. Nair, Mark Sheridan, Matthias Jaeger, David Anderson and Christopher G. Maher. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Journal of neurosurgery and Neurosurgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.