Michael F. Knox
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 5%
- Surgery
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Internal Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Paul W. MarshallSiobhan M. SchabrunJason SieglerRic LovellLucy ChipchaseMatthew WestonThuong Van HaDavid Rosenthal
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers)Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (5 papers)Sports Performance and Training (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michael F. Knox
22 papers receiving 611 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Pharmacology 227
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 181
- Surgery 140
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 103
- Internal Medicine 102
Countries citing papers authored by Michael F. Knox
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael F. Knox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael F. Knox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael F. Knox more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael F. Knox
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael F. Knox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael F. Knox. The network helps show where Michael F. Knox may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael F. Knox
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael F. Knox. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael F. Knox based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael F. Knox. Michael F. Knox is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | Comparative Quality-of-Life Perspectives of Older Australians With and Without Intellectual Disability | 1 |
| 8 | 64 | |
| 9 | 174 | |
| 10 | 63 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 35 | |
| 14 | 46 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 57 | |
| 18 | 30 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 23 |
About Michael F. Knox
Michael F. Knox is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Occupational Therapy and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 24 papers that have together received 634 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (5 papers) and Sports Performance and Training (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (102 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (181 citations) and Pharmacology (227 citations). Michael F. Knox has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paul W. Marshall, Siobhan M. Schabrun, Jason Siegler, Ric Lovell, Lucy Chipchase, Matthew Weston, Thuong Van Ha, David Rosenthal, H. Bob Smouse and William D. Voorhees. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research and Journal of Sports Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.