R W Teasell
- Surgery
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Rheumatology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Douglas K. DittmerSwati MehtaMaureen C. AsheLeora C. SwartzmanSteven MacalusoLijie TuAllan P. ShapiroJo-Anne Aubut
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers)Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers)Occupational Health and Safety Research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- Canada
In The Last Decade
R W Teasell
12 papers receiving 535 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Surgery 206
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 156
- Pharmacology 142
- Rheumatology 90
- Psychiatry and Mental health 83
Countries citing papers authored by R W Teasell
This map shows the geographic impact of R W Teasell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R W Teasell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R W Teasell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R W Teasell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R W Teasell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R W Teasell. The network helps show where R W Teasell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R W Teasell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R W Teasell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R W Teasell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R W Teasell. R W Teasell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 39 | |
| 2 | 96 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 37 | |
| 6 | 54 | |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | Complications of immobilization and bed rest. Part 2: Other complications. | 114 |
| 9 | Managing advanced multiple sclerosis. | 10 |
| 10 | Complications of immobilization and bed rest. Part 1: Musculoskeletal and cardiovascular complications. | 167 |
| 11 | Autonomic dysreflexia after brainstem tumor resection. A case report. | 16 |
| 12 | The whiplash patient a sympathetic approach | 2 |
About R W Teasell
R W Teasell is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Pharmacology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 574 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers) and Occupational Health and Safety Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (156 citations), Pharmacology (142 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (42 citations). R W Teasell has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Douglas K. Dittmer, Swati Mehta, Maureen C. Ashe, Leora C. Swartzman, Steven Macaluso, Lijie Tu, Allan P. Shapiro, Jo-Anne Aubut, Keith Sequeira and Manfred Harth. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Epidemiology, Spine and Clinical Journal of Pain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.