James Latham

504 citations
10 papers · 297 indexed · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

James Latham

7 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers

James Latham
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 192
  • Business and International Management 49
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 175
  • Gender Studies 31
  • Management Information Systems 24
Replace Michela Betta with:
Michela Betta Australia
Karen Verduyn Netherlands
Robert Jones Australia
Anja Klaukien Germany
Anne Domurath Canada
Yvon Gasse Canada
Rui Shu China
Silvia Stroe Italy
Caroline Parkinson United Kingdom
Lena Olaison Denmark
James Latham relative to Michela Betta Australia Michela Betta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Michela Betta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Latham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Latham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Latham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Latham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Latham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Latham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Latham. The network helps show where James Latham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside James Latham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Latham Line = papers co-authored together James Latham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20140
3 201235
4 2011112
5 201017
6 2008125
7 20064
8
The Kaiser as the Beast of Berlin: Race and the Animalizing of German-Ness in Early Hollywood's Advertising Imagery
20031
9 20031
10
Saracen archery : an English version and exposition of a Mameluke work on archery (ca. A.D. 1368)
19702

About James Latham

James Latham is a scholar working on Archeology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Business and International Management and Philosophy, having authored 10 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Business Performance and Succession (4 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (4 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers), Cultural Identity and Representation (1 paper), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (1 paper), Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts (1 paper), Polish Historical and Cultural Studies (1 paper) and Cinema and Media Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (192 citations), Business and International Management (49 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (175 citations), Gender Studies (31 citations) and Management Information Systems (24 citations). James Latham has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michela Betta, Robert Jones, David Goss, Robert G. Jones and Robert Alun Jones. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, Film Quarterly, Organization Studies, Philosophy of Management and The International Journal of Human Resource Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026