Philosophy of Management

435 papers and 1.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 435 papers published in Philosophy of Management in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Philosophy of Management usually cover Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (140 papers), Sociology and Political Science (79 papers) and Information Systems and Management (74 papers) specifically the topics of Management and Organizational Studies (109 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (73 papers) and Management Theory and Practice (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Philosophy of Management are Ron Beadle, Vincent Blok, Jeremy Moon, Matthias P. Hühn, Alasdair MacIntyre, Manuel Wörsdörfer, Domènec Melé, Mark Dibben, Russell Keat and John Dobson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Philosophy of Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Philosophy of Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Philosophy of Management.

Countries where authors publish in Philosophy of Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Philosophy of Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Philosophy of Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philosophy of Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025