Citations per year, relative to Lena Olaison Lena Olaison (= 1×)
peers
Hans Anton Stubberud
Countries citing papers authored by Lena Olaison
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Lena Olaison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lena Olaison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lena Olaison more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lena Olaison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lena Olaison. The network helps show where Lena Olaison may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lena Olaison
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lena Olaison.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lena Olaison based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lena Olaison. Lena Olaison is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Spoelstra, Sverre, Martin Parker, Simon Lilley, & Lena Olaison. (2023). Reopening the Field:Reading/Writing Robert Cooper Today. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School).1 indexed citations
2.
Olaison, Lena, et al.. (2019). Ghostly Matters in Organizing. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School). 19(1). 1–29.5 indexed citations
3.
Olaison, Lena, et al.. (2018). Conceptual Activism:Entrepreneurship Education as a Philosophical Project. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School).
4.
Olaison, Lena, et al.. (2017). Game of Gamification:Marketing, Consumer Resistance and Digital Play. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School).2 indexed citations
Olaison, Lena, et al.. (2017). Organizing for the post-growth economy. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 17(1). 1–21.10 indexed citations
7.
Breit, Eric, Thomas Taro Lennerfors, & Lena Olaison. (2015). Critiquing corruption: A turn to theory. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School). 15(2). 319–336.16 indexed citations
Olaison, Lena. (2014). Entrepreneurship at the limits. Econstor (Econstor).2 indexed citations
10.
Olaison, Lena, et al.. (2012). The Indirect Approach of Semi-Focused Groups:Expanding Focus Group Research through Role-Playing. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School).2 indexed citations
11.
Olaison, Lena, et al.. (2011). Limits of the Gift: Exploring Interaction in Antiquarian Bookshops. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School). 9. 11–21.1 indexed citations
12.
Kenny, Kate, Sara Louise Muhr, & Lena Olaison. (2011). The Effect of Affect: Desire and Politics in Modern Organizations. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School). 11(3). 235–242.6 indexed citations
13.
Butler, Nick, Lena Olaison, Martyna Śliwa, Bent Meier Sørensen, & Sverre Spoelstra. (2011). Work, Play and Boredom. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School). 11(4). 329–335.12 indexed citations
Olaison, Lena, et al.. (2009). The indirect approach of semi‐focused groups. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal. 4(1). 7–26.9 indexed citations
16.
Olaison, Lena, et al.. (2009). 'No we can't'. Crisis as chance. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School). 9(1). 1–7.1 indexed citations
Johannisson, Bengt & Lena Olaison. (2006). Emergency Entrepreneurship : Creative Organising in the Eye of the Storm.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.