James Faulconbridge
About
In The Last Decade
James Faulconbridge
120 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
- Sociology and Political Science 948
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 821
- Strategy and Management 750
- Urban Studies 674
- Economics and Econometrics 615
Countries citing papers authored by James Faulconbridge
This map shows the geographic impact of James Faulconbridge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Faulconbridge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Faulconbridge more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Faulconbridge
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Faulconbridge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Faulconbridge. The network helps show where James Faulconbridge may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Faulconbridge
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Faulconbridge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Faulconbridge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Faulconbridge. James Faulconbridge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | |
| 2 | Karl Polanyi on Strategy: The Effects of Culture, Morality and Double-Movements on Embedded Strategy | 0 |
| 3 | 81 | |
| 4 | Flexi-mobility : helping local authorities unlock low carbon travel? | 7 |
| 5 | Transnational Corporations Shaping Institutional Change: The Case of English Law Firms in Germany | 2 |
| 6 | Alliance 'Capitalism' and Legal Education: An English Perspective | 2 |
| 7 | Managing Institutional Difference in TNCs through Training Academies: Italian Lawyers in Transnational Law Firms and Their Institutionalised Practices | 0 |
| 8 | Professions in a globalizing world: towards a transnational sociology of the professions | 2 |
| 9 | Towards Corporate Professionalization: The Case of Project Management, Management Consultancy and Executive Search | 20 |
| 10 | Global Architects: Learning and Innovation Through Communities and Constellations of Practice | 2 |
| 11 | Professionalization, Legitimization and the Creation of Executive Search Markets in Europe | 1 |
| 12 | Introduction: Financial Geographies-The Credit Crisis as an Opportunity to Catch Economic Geography's Next Boat? | 2 |
| 13 | The ‘War for Talent’: The Gatekeeper Role of Executive Search Firms in Elite Labour Markets | 0 |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | Corporate ecologies of business travel : working towards a research agenda. | 3 |
| 16 | Organizational Professionalism in Global Law Firms | 10 |
| 17 | New Insights into the Internationalization of Producer Services: Organizational Strategies and Spatial Economies for Global Headhunting Firms | 1 |
| 18 | Re-Inserting the Professional in the Study of PSFs | 8 |
| 19 | Global Law Firms: Globalization and Organizational Spaces of Cross-Border Legal Work | 21 |
| 20 | 12 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.