James F Reeve
- Health Information Management top 1%
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 5%
- General Health Professions
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Emergency Medical Services top 10%
- Co-authors
- Margaret WilliamsonDavid NewbySallie‐Anne PearsonJane RobertsonAnnette MoxeyIsla HainsGregory M. PetersonPeter Tenni
- Topics
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (8 papers)Electronic Health Records Systems (7 papers)Clinical practice guidelines implementation (4 papers)
- Journals
- British Journal of Clinical PharmacologyBMC Health Services ResearchThe Medical Journal of Australia
- Partner nations
- AustraliaSpainUnited States
In The Last Decade
James F Reeve
12 papers receiving 247 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Health Information Management 143
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 95
- General Health Professions 69
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 53
- Emergency Medical Services 43
Countries citing papers authored by James F Reeve
This map shows the geographic impact of James F Reeve's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James F Reeve with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James F Reeve more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James F Reeve
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James F Reeve. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James F Reeve. The network helps show where James F Reeve may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James F Reeve
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James F Reeve. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James F Reeve based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James F Reeve. James F Reeve is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | Improving clinical decision support tools - challenges and a way forward. | 4 |
| 7 | A Preliminary Investigation of an Integration Tool to Improve Access to Information Resources in Clinical Software | 0 |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 142 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 11 |
About James F Reeve
James F Reeve is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Health Information Management, having authored 13 papers that have together received 259 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (8 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (7 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (143 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (95 citations) and Medical Terminology (4 citations). James F Reeve has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Williamson, David Newby, Sallie‐Anne Pearson, Jane Robertson, Annette Moxey, Isla Hains, Gregory M. Peterson, Peter Tenni, Ken Harvey and Peter Schattner. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, BMC Health Services Research and The Medical Journal of Australia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.