Jane Robertson
Impact in
-
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 1%
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Papers in
-
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes 10
- Co-authors
- David HenryDavid NewbySallie‐Anne PearsonMargaret WilliamsonIsla HainsEmily WalkomAnnette MoxeyRonald D. Barr
- Journals
- The Medical Journal of Australia (7 papers)Bulletin of the World Health Organization (4 papers)BMC Health Services Research (4 papers)International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (3 papers)Pediatric Blood & Cancer (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jane Robertson
66 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 150
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 262
- Health Information Management 281
- Family Practice 91
- Medical Terminology 7
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Robertson
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Robertson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Robertson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Robertson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Robertson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Robertson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Robertson. The network helps show where Jane Robertson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Robertson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 37 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 220 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 27 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 23 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 26 | |
| 16 | 2001 | 19 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 19 | |
| 18 | 1998 | 13 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1993 | 30 |
About Jane Robertson
Jane Robertson is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Health Information Management and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 66 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (23 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (21 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (11 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (10 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (10 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (10 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (9 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (150 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (262 citations), Health Information Management (281 citations), Family Practice (91 citations) and Medical Terminology (7 citations). Jane Robertson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Henry, David Newby, Sallie‐Anne Pearson, Margaret Williamson, Isla Hains, Emily Walkom, Annette Moxey, Ronald D. Barr, Philip Hazell and Dianne O’Connell. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, BMC Health Services Research, International Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Pediatric Blood & Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.