1.3k total citations 47 papers, 877 citations indexed
About
James E. Dyer is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Education and Gender Studies.
According to data from OpenAlex, James E. Dyer has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 877 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 28 papers in Education and 9 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in James E. Dyer's work include Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (36 papers), Indigenous and Place-Based Education (13 papers) and Gender and Technology in Education (9 papers). James E. Dyer is often cited by papers focused on Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (36 papers), Indigenous and Place-Based Education (13 papers) and Gender and Technology in Education (9 papers). James E. Dyer collaborates with scholars based in United States. James E. Dyer's co-authors include Brian E. Myers, Edward W. Osborne, T. Grady Roberts, Bryan L. Garton, Anna Ball, David L. Williams, Robert J. Birkenholz, Andrew C. Thoron and David L. Williams and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Agricultural Education and Journal of Applied Communications.
In The Last Decade
James E. Dyer
44 papers
receiving
458 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Dyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Dyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Dyer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Dyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Dyer. The network helps show where James E. Dyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James E. Dyer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James E. Dyer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James E. Dyer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James E. Dyer. James E. Dyer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dyer, James E., et al.. (2003). Publishing agricultural news: a study of Arkansas daily newspaper editors. Journal of Applied Communications.6 indexed citations
9.
Myers, Brian E. & James E. Dyer. (2003). Advising Components, Roles, and Perceived Level of Competence of University Faculty.1 indexed citations
Myers, Brian E. & James E. Dyer. (2002). Making Science Applicable - the Need for a Modern Agricultural Education Curriculum. The Agricultural education magazine. 74(5). 24.
Garton, Bryan L., et al.. (2000). Predicting College Agriculture Students' Academic Performance and Retention: A Trend Study..4 indexed citations
16.
Dyer, James E. & Edward W. Osborne. (1999). EFFECTS OF STUDENT LEARNING STYLES ON SHORT AND LONG TERM RETENTION OF SUBJECT MATTER USING VARIOUS TEACHING APPROACHES. Journal of Agricultural Education. 40(2). 11–18.3 indexed citations
Dyer, James E.. (1995). Effects of teaching approach on achievement, retention, and problem-solving ability of Illinois agricultural education students with varying learning styles.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.