Jaime Banks
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Nicholas David BowmanKevin KobanMaartje M.A. de GraafSima ZadehMary Jo KupstMartha A. GrootenhuisAnne E. KazakAnnah N. Abrams
- Topics
- Digital Games and Media (20 papers)Media Influence and Health (19 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (14 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaSocial Science & MedicineComputers in Human Behavior
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustriaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Jaime Banks
69 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Sociology and Political Science 560
- Social Psychology 318
- Artificial Intelligence 218
- Literature and Literary Theory 200
- Cognitive Neuroscience 185
Countries citing papers authored by Jaime Banks
This map shows the geographic impact of Jaime Banks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jaime Banks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jaime Banks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jaime Banks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jaime Banks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jaime Banks. The network helps show where Jaime Banks may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jaime Banks
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jaime Banks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jaime Banks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jaime Banks. Jaime Banks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 81 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | The duo is in the details: Game genre differences in player-avatar relations | 1 |
| 17 | 180 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | Dwarf acts like a lady: The importance of gender roles in understanding gender switching and player behavior | 1 |
| 20 | Close intimate playthings? Understanding player-avatar relationships as a function of attachment, agency, and intimacy | 17 |
About Jaime Banks
Jaime Banks is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (20 papers), Media Influence and Health (19 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (174 citations), Safety Research (166 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (200 citations). Jaime Banks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas David Bowman, Kevin Koban, Maartje M.A. de Graaf, Sima Zadeh, Mary Jo Kupst, Martha A. Grootenhuis, Anne E. Kazak, Annah N. Abrams, Joe A. Wasserman and Sunita K. Patel. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Science & Medicine and Computers in Human Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.