Jacob van den Berg

740 citations
33 papers · 424 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jacob van den Berg

32 papers receiving 399 citations

Peers

Jacob van den Berg
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Mathematical Physics 224
  • Statistics and Probability 168
  • Condensed Matter Physics 186
  • Electrochemistry 39
  • Bioengineering 20
Replace Wei-Kuo Chen with:
Wei-Kuo Chen United States
Hannu Reittu Finland
Antoine Gerschenfeld France
Justin Salez France
Francesco Manzo Italy
Maryna Viazovska Switzerland
Ronald Rietman Netherlands
Xing Wu China
Михаил Иванович Штогрин Russia
Jacob van den Berg relative to Wei-Kuo Chen United States Wei-Kuo Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Wei-Kuo Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jacob van den Berg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jacob van den Berg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacob van den Berg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacob van den Berg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jacob van den Berg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacob van den Berg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacob van den Berg. The network helps show where Jacob van den Berg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jacob van den Berg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jacob van den Berg Line = papers co-authored together Jacob van den Berg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199460
2 198449
3 199346
4 201035
5 198732
6 199630
7 199927
8 199314
9 200413
10 200011
11 199210
12 200010
13 19969
14 20049
15 20079
16 20118
17 19827
18 20116
19 19886
20 20126

About Jacob van den Berg

Jacob van den Berg is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Statistics and Probability, Condensed Matter Physics, Computer Networks and Communications and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (21 papers), Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (13 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (9 papers), Random Matrices and Applications (7 papers), Distributed systems and fault tolerance (3 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (3 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (3 papers) and Advanced Data Storage Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (224 citations), Statistics and Probability (168 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (186 citations), Electrochemistry (39 citations) and Bioengineering (20 citations). Jacob van den Berg has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Christian Maes, Jeffrey E. Steif, Ken Goldberg, E. Barendrecht, Pieter Abbeel, Rachel M. Brouwer, Pierre Nolin, Alberto Gandolfi, Harry Kesten and G. J. Nieuwenhuys. Their work appears in journals such as Electronic Communications in Probability, The Annals of Probability, Random Structures and Algorithms, Journal of Applied Probability and Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für physikalische Chemie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact