Replace Probability Theory and Related Fields with:
Probability Theory and Related FieldsUnited States
Journal of Applied ProbabilityUnited States
Stochastic Processes and their ApplicationsUnited States
Advances in Applied ProbabilityUnited States
American Mathematical MonthlyUnited States
Mathematics of ComputationUnited States
Statistics & Probability LettersUnited States
Journal of Computational and Applied MathematicsChina
Transactions of the American Mathematical SocietyUnited States
Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its ApplicationsChina
Probability Theory and Related FieldsUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to The Annals of Probability
The Annals of Probability · 1×
×0.944.9kMP
×0.933.8kSP
×1.032.3kFINAN
×0.712.7kMSOR
×0.812.9kAI
Citations per year, relative to The Annals of Probability
The Annals of Probability · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in The Annals of Probability
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Annals of Probability. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Annals of Probability with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Annals of Probability more than expected).
Fields of papers published in The Annals of Probability
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Annals of Probability. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Annals of Probability.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.