Pierre Nolin

42 papers receiving 964 citations

Peers

Pierre Nolin
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Mathematical Physics 167
  • Statistics and Probability 142
  • Human-Computer Interaction 92
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 163
  • Condensed Matter Physics 124
Replace Mary Jane Weiss with:
Mary Jane Weiss United States
Paul J. Seignourel United States
Rosapia Lauro Grotto Italy
Débora Areces Spain
Wendy Best United Kingdom
Phillip J. Bairstow Australia
Flávia H. Santos Brazil
Alberto García‐Molina Spain
Samuel J. Rosenberg United States
Dulce María Romero Ayuso Spain
Pierre Nolin relative to Mary Jane Weiss United States Mary Jane Weiss's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×62×
Mary Jane Weiss · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pierre Nolin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pierre Nolin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pierre Nolin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pierre Nolin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pierre Nolin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pierre Nolin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pierre Nolin. The network helps show where Pierre Nolin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pierre Nolin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pierre Nolin Line = papers co-authored together Pierre Nolin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007110
2 201498
3 201689
4 201362
5 200661
6 200859
7 200651
8 201248
9 201541
10 200639
11 201137
12 200829
13 201228
14 201026
15 200624
16 201123
17 201417
18 201017
19 201017
20 201216

About Pierre Nolin

Pierre Nolin is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Statistics and Probability, Condensed Matter Physics, Epidemiology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (13 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (10 papers), Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (9 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (7 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (4 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers) and Random Matrices and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (167 citations), Statistics and Probability (142 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (92 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (163 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (124 citations). Pierre Nolin has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Louise S. Éthier, Philippe Allain, Christian C. Joyal, Jérémy Besnard, Paul Richard, Carl Lacharité, Frédéric Banville, Dany Lussier‐Desrochers, Yves Lachapelle and David Fontaine. Their work appears in journals such as Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, Electronic Journal of Probability, Electronic Communications in Probability and Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact