Jack Lively

515 citations
14 papers · 122 indexed · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Jack Lively

13 papers receiving 91 citations

Peers

Jack Lively
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Political Science and International Relations 77
  • History 31
  • Philosophy 20
  • Religious studies 7
  • History and Philosophy of Science 5
Replace William Lamont with:
William Lamont United Kingdom
Nicholas Phillipson United Kingdom
Janelle Greenberg United States
J. A. Fernández-Santamaría United States
Pieter Geyl
Mark Hulliung United States
Frederick G. Whelan United States
Francesco Guicciardini
R. J. Schoeck United States
Michael G. Baylor United States
Jack Lively relative to William Lamont United Kingdom William Lamont's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
William Lamont · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Lively

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Lively's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Lively with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Lively more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Lively

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Lively. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Lively. The network helps show where Jack Lively may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Jack Lively, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Lively Line = papers co-authored together Jack Lively links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1
The social and political thought of Alexis de Tocqueville
196243
2
Utilitarian Logic and Politics: James Mill's Essay on Government, MacAulay's Critique and the Ensuing Debate
199617
3 196614
4 196513
5
The works of Joseph de Maistre
197113
6
Democracy, consensus & social contract
19788
7 19693
8 19792
9
Democracy in Britain: A Reader
19942
10 19812
11 19972
12 20132
13 19671
14 19900

About Jack Lively

Jack Lively is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 14 papers that have together received 122 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Theory and Influence (3 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (2 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (1 paper), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (1 paper), Historical and Literary Analyses (1 paper) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (77 citations), History (31 citations), Philosophy (20 citations), Religious studies (7 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (5 citations). Jack Lively has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Babington Macaulay Macaulay, Joseph de Maistre, John Rees, James Mill, Pierre Birnbaum, Geraint Parry and Andrew Reeve. Their work appears in journals such as Parliamentary Affairs, Utilitas, Democratization, History of European Ideas and Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact